Prevention of complications resulting from endovascular carotid sacrifice: a retrospective assessment
To determine the protective effects of various periprocedural interventions in the prevention of cerebral ischemia as a complication of endovascular carotid sacrifice (ECS). Thirty-two cases of ECS performed at our institution, between October 1987 and July 1998, were reviewed. Fifteen patients unde...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurosurgery 2000-04, Vol.46 (4), p.910-917 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine the protective effects of various periprocedural interventions in the prevention of cerebral ischemia as a complication of endovascular carotid sacrifice (ECS).
Thirty-two cases of ECS performed at our institution, between October 1987 and July 1998, were reviewed. Fifteen patients underwent superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypass surgery. In 21 patients, the carotid artery was occluded proximal to the target lesion; and in 11 patients, a lesion trapping procedure was performed. Six patients were prophylactically anticoagulated, 14 received antiplatelet agents prophylactically, and 12 received no pharmacoprophylaxis.
Among the six patients who were anticoagulated, there were no embolic events. Embolic events affected 4 of 14 patients receiving prophylactic antiplatelet agents, 2 of 12 patients receiving no pharmacoprophylaxis, 1 of 11 patients who underwent a trapping procedure, and 5 of 21 patients whose carotid artery was occluded proximal to the target lesion. Postocclusion cerebral ischemia developed in 7 of 15 patients who underwent bypass surgery, and in 1 of the remaining 17.
Superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypass did not protect against postocclusion cerebral ischemia after ECS in this series (P = 0.01). Although the small number of patients studied precludes statistical validity (P = 0.29), the trends suggest that antiplatelet agents provide no protection against postocclusion cerebral emboli after ECS. Prophylactic anticoagulation (P = 0.32) and lesion trapping (P = 0.12) may reduce the frequency of postocclusion embolic events after ECS; however, because of the small number of patients, statistical significance could not be demonstrated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-396X 1524-4040 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00006123-200004000-00025 |