Orbital sinus blood sampling in rats: effects upon selected behavioural variables

The question addressed was whether the behaviour of rats is changed after orbital sinus blood sampling while they are under diethyl-ether anaesthesia. Twelve rats were subjected to sham anaesthesia, diethyl-ether anaesthesia and anaesthesia plus orbital puncture according to a Latin square. After ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Laboratory animals (London) 2000, Vol.34 (1), p.10-19
Hauptverfasser: Herck, H. van, Baumans, V, Boere, H.A.G, Hesp, A.P.M, Lith, H.A. van, Beynen, A.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The question addressed was whether the behaviour of rats is changed after orbital sinus blood sampling while they are under diethyl-ether anaesthesia. Twelve rats were subjected to sham anaesthesia, diethyl-ether anaesthesia and anaesthesia plus orbital puncture according to a Latin square. After each treatment, the behaviour of the rats was automatically monitored using the so-called LABORAS method, which discriminates between grooming, locomotion and inactivity. Treatment ended, and behaviour monitoring began, when the light period changed over to the dark period. The various behaviours were quantified as relative duration and frequency. Anaesthesia versus sham anaesthesia reduced the relative duration of grooming during the first 5 h after treatment. Anaesthesia plus orbital puncture versus anaesthesia alone did not significantly influence grooming, but orbital puncture did reduce the relative duration and the frequency of locomotion during the entire 20 h period, which was mainly due to a decrease in the dark period. After orbital puncture, the animals were also less frequently inactive. It is concluded that orbital puncture has an effect on behaviour superimposed on that of diethyl-ether anaesthesia. This observation may contribute new arguments to the debate on the acceptability of the orbital puncture technique.
ISSN:0023-6772
1758-1117
DOI:10.1258/002367700780577993