Comparison of a New Method for the Direct and Simultaneous Assessment of LDL- and HDL-Cholesterol with Ultracentrifugation and Established Methods
Automated electrophoresis combined with enzymatic cholesterol staining might improve routine assessment of LDL- and HDL-cholesterol (LDLC and HDLC), as an alternative to the Friedewald equation and precipitation. A new method (Hydrasys; SEBIA) that adapts the cholesterol esterase/cholesterol oxidase...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2000-04, Vol.46 (4), p.493-505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Automated electrophoresis combined with enzymatic cholesterol staining might improve routine assessment of LDL- and HDL-cholesterol (LDLC and HDLC), as an alternative to the Friedewald equation and precipitation. A new method (Hydrasys; SEBIA) that adapts the cholesterol esterase/cholesterol oxidase reaction within urea-free gels was evaluated.
Fresh sera from 725 subjects (512 dyslipidemics) were analyzed by electrophoresis, in parallel with sequential ultracentrifugation, beta-quantification, calculation, and precipitation.
Electrophoresis was linear up to 4 g/L cholesterol, with a detection limit of 0.042 g/L cholesterol/band. Within-run, between-run, between-batch, and between-operator imprecision (CVs) were 1.6%, 2.0%, 1.5%, and 2.7% for LDLC, and 3.9%, 4.3%, 5.5%, and 4.9% for HDLC, and remained unchanged up to 6.3 g/L plasma triglycerides (TGs). Precision decreased with very low HDLC (4 g/L (r = 0.91). Bias (2.88% +/- 12%) and total error (7.84%) were unchanged at TG concentrations up to 18.5 g/L. Electrophoresis predicted National Cholesterol Education Program cut-points with 1.5 g/L) the percentage of subjects underestimated by calculation. One-half of the patients with TGs >4 g/L had LDLC >1.30 g/L. For HDLC, correlation was better with precipitation (r = 0.87) than ultracentrifugation (r = 0.76). Error (-0.10% +/- 26%) increased when HDLC decreased ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-9147 1530-8561 |
DOI: | 10.1093/clinchem/46.4.493 |