A single normal ultrasonographic scan at age 65 years rules out significant aneurysm disease for life in men

Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been carried out in Gloucestershire since 1990. All men in the county are offered aortic ultrasonography in their 65th year. Men with an aortic diameter of less than 26 mm are considered ‘normal’ and no follow‐up is arranged. The aim of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 2001-07, Vol.88 (7), p.941-944
Hauptverfasser: Crow, P., Shaw, E., Earnshaw, J. J., Poskitt, K. R., Whyman, M. R., Heather, B. P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been carried out in Gloucestershire since 1990. All men in the county are offered aortic ultrasonography in their 65th year. Men with an aortic diameter of less than 26 mm are considered ‘normal’ and no follow‐up is arranged. The aim of this study was to ascertain if men with ‘normal’ aortic diameters at age 65 years ever develop a clinically significant aneurysm. Methods: A cohort study was performed on 223 65‐year‐old men who had an aorta of less than 26 mm in diameter in 1988. These men had repeat ultrasonography in 1993 and 2000. The causes of death in men who died during this interval were investigated. Results: Eight men were lost to follow‐up. As far as it was possible to ascertain, none of the 86 men who died over the 12‐year interval did so from ruptured AAA. There was no clinically significant increase in mean aortic diameter in the remaining 129 men who had three serial ultrasonographic scans over the 12‐year interval. Conclusion: A single, ‘normal’ ultrasound scan at age 65 years effectively rules out the risk of clinically significant aneurysm disease for life in men. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01822.x