Subtotal hysterectomy for uterine rupture

Objective: The aim of this paper was to stratify patients with uterine rupture in extremis (with hypotension, change in vital organ function, and altered mental status) and evaluate outcome for patients undergoing subtotal hysterectomy (STH) vs. uterine repair (UR). Methods: Of 39 667 hospital deliv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2001-07, Vol.74 (1), p.29-33
Hauptverfasser: Thakur, A, Heer, M.S, Thakur, V, Heer, G.K, Narone, J.N, Narone, R.K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The aim of this paper was to stratify patients with uterine rupture in extremis (with hypotension, change in vital organ function, and altered mental status) and evaluate outcome for patients undergoing subtotal hysterectomy (STH) vs. uterine repair (UR). Methods: Of 39 667 hospital deliveries between 1993 and 1998 at a university hospital, 367 presented with uterine rupture. Of these, 96 presented in extremis and had an irregularly torn uterus found at operation. Charts were retrospectively reviewed to stratify patient population with uterine rupture and their outcome. Results were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Results: Patients with uterine rupture were 31–35 years old, para≥3, had received no antenatal care, and presented with rupture in the lower uterine segment. Sixty-one patients underwent STH while 35 underwent UR. The groups were similar with respect to patient age, parity, cause of rupture, and clinical condition at the time of evaluation ( P=0.2). The operative time for STH was significantly less than UR, 35 min vs. 75 min ( P
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00389-7