Symptom and quality of life survey of medical oncology patients at a Veterans Affairs medical center : A role for Symptom Assessment

The current study was conducted to assess symptom prevalence and symptom intensity and their relation to quality of life in medical oncology patients at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Consecutive inpatients and outpatients were asked to complete the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT-G),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2000-03, Vol.88 (5), p.1175-1183
Hauptverfasser: CHANG, V. T, HWANG, S. S, FEUERMAN, M, KASIMIS, B. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The current study was conducted to assess symptom prevalence and symptom intensity and their relation to quality of life in medical oncology patients at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Consecutive inpatients and outpatients were asked to complete the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT-G), Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), and the Brief Pain Inventory. Symptoms then were analyzed by their relation to Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and quality of life. Two hundred forty patients participated. The median number of symptoms was 8 per patient (range, 0-30 symptoms). The 5 most prevalent symptoms were lack of energy (62%), pain (59%), dry mouth (54%), shortness of breath (50%), and difficulty sleeping (45%). Patients with moderate intensity pain had a median number of 11 symptoms and patients with moderate intensity lack of energy had a median number of 13 symptoms. The number of intense symptoms increased as the KPS decreased (P < 0.001). Patients with moderately intense pain or fatigue also were more likely to experience nausea, dyspnea, and lack of appetite. The number of symptoms rated as present on the MSAS was found to correlate significantly with the FACT-G Sum Quality of Life score. Intense symptoms were highly prevalent in this population. The presence of pain, lack of energy, or poor performance status should lead to comprehensive symptom assessment. Patients free of disease nevertheless still may experience intense symptoms. The number of symptoms present may be a helpful guide to quality of life. Routine comprehensive symptom assessment may identify a significant fraction of patients who urgently require intensive symptom palliation.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1175::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-N