Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Hip Fractures: A Comparison of the Arteriovenous Impulse System and Aspirin
BACKGROUND:A prospective, randomized controlled trial was used to compare the efficacy of the arteriovenous (AV) impulse system and aspirin in reducing venous thrombosis after fracture to the femoral neck. METHODS:A total of 143 patients underwent hemiarthroplasty, after which 70 patients were treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of trauma 2000-02, Vol.48 (2), p.268-372 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND:A prospective, randomized controlled trial was used to compare the efficacy of the arteriovenous (AV) impulse system and aspirin in reducing venous thrombosis after fracture to the femoral neck.
METHODS:A total of 143 patients underwent hemiarthroplasty, after which 70 patients were treated with the AV pump and a second group of 73 patients were commenced on 325 mg of aspirin. Duplex ultrasound was used to assess both proximal and distal venous thrombi on days 7 to 10. Calf and thigh circumferences were also measured.
RESULTS:Thrombi developed in seven of the patients treated with aspirin and in four patients treated with the AV pump. No statistically significant difference could be established (p = 0.109). There was a significant reduction in both calf (p = 0.003) and thigh (p = 0.002) swelling in the group treated with the AV pump. Neither treatment group was a significant predictor of a poorer outcome by using logistical regression analysis (p = 0.258).
CONCLUSIONS:Both aspirin and the AV pump are effective in reducing thromboembolic events after hemiarthroplasty of the hip. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-5282 1529-8809 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00005373-200002000-00012 |