Psychometric evaluation of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised
Objective: To measure the internal consistency and construct validity of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R). Method: 158 sexually abused children, ages 7–12, and a nonabusive parent or primary caretaker completed a series of measures, including the CITES-R. A subsample...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Child abuse & neglect 2001-03, Vol.25 (3), p.401-411 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 411 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 401 |
| container_title | Child abuse & neglect |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Chaffin, Mark Shultz, Shelli K. |
| description | Objective: To measure the internal consistency and construct validity of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R).
Method: 158 sexually abused children, ages 7–12, and a nonabusive parent or primary caretaker completed a series of measures, including the CITES-R. A subsample of 17 repeated the assessment after 1 to 2 months with intervening treatment.
Results: Internal consistency for the CITES-R scales averaged .69. Associations with other measures were in predicted directions, although most were modest in size. Parent-report measures were virtually unrelated to any child-report measure, including the CITES-R. Change over time during treatment was noted on most symptom scales.
Conclusions: The psychometric adequacy of the CITES-R was moderately supported. The main symptom scales of the instrument performed well. The performance of other scales was more variable.
Objetivo: Medir la consistencia interna y construir la validez de la Escala para Niños del Impacto de Eventos Traumáticos Revisada (Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised CITES-R).
Método: 158 niños abusados sexualmente, de edad 7 a 12 años, y un padre/madre no abusivo o el cuidador primario completaron una serie de medidas, incluyendo el CITES-R. Una sub-muestra de 17 repitieron la evaluación después de 1 a 2 meses de transcurrido el tratamiento.
Resultados: La consistencia interna de las escalas CITES-R promediaron .69. Las asociaciones con otras medidas fueron en las direcciones predichas, a pesar de que la mayorı́a fueron modestas en tamaño. Las medidas del reporte parental no estuvieron virtualmente relacionadas con ninguna de las medidas del reporte del niño, incluyendo las CITES-R. Se observó cambio durante el tratamiento en casi todas las escalas de sı́ntomas.
Conclusiones: La adecuación psicométrica de la CITES-R fue modestamente apoyada. Las principales escalas del instrumento se comportaron bien. Hubo mayor variación en el comportamiento de las otras escalas. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00257-X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70942886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014521340000257X</els_id><sourcerecordid>70942886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-926e232e5f20fa11b84f2551d317608fb946d1a6edf647523c57120be87d3bc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtKxDAUgOEgio6XR1AKguiimmvTrkQGbyAoOoK7kCYnTKSXMWkH3Pkavp5PYscZdGk2WeQ7SfgR2if4lGCSnT1hwkVKCePHGJ9gTIVMX9bQiOSSpVIKuY5Gv2QLbcf4ioclpNhEW4RwwlmRj9DkIb6baVtDF7xJYK6rXne-bZLWJd0UkvHUVzZA8_XxGZPbeqZNtziaBN3XAzTJ5RyaLiZPRleQPsLcR7C7aMPpKsLeat9Bz1eXk_FNend_fTu-uEsNp7hLC5oBZRSEo9hpQsqcOyoEsYzIDOeuLHhmic7AuoxLQZkRklBcQi4tKw1jO-hoee8stG89xE7VPhqoKt1A20clccFpnmcDFEtoQhtjAKdmwdc6vCuC1SKn-smpFq0Uxuonp3oZ5g5WD_RlDfZvatVvAIcroONQwAXdGB9_XcFkTvmgzpcKhhhzD0FF46ExYH0A0ynb-n8-8g2MQZGO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70942886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Chaffin, Mark ; Shultz, Shelli K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaffin, Mark ; Shultz, Shelli K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To measure the internal consistency and construct validity of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R).
Method: 158 sexually abused children, ages 7–12, and a nonabusive parent or primary caretaker completed a series of measures, including the CITES-R. A subsample of 17 repeated the assessment after 1 to 2 months with intervening treatment.
Results: Internal consistency for the CITES-R scales averaged .69. Associations with other measures were in predicted directions, although most were modest in size. Parent-report measures were virtually unrelated to any child-report measure, including the CITES-R. Change over time during treatment was noted on most symptom scales.
Conclusions: The psychometric adequacy of the CITES-R was moderately supported. The main symptom scales of the instrument performed well. The performance of other scales was more variable.
Objetivo: Medir la consistencia interna y construir la validez de la Escala para Niños del Impacto de Eventos Traumáticos Revisada (Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised CITES-R).
Método: 158 niños abusados sexualmente, de edad 7 a 12 años, y un padre/madre no abusivo o el cuidador primario completaron una serie de medidas, incluyendo el CITES-R. Una sub-muestra de 17 repitieron la evaluación después de 1 a 2 meses de transcurrido el tratamiento.
Resultados: La consistencia interna de las escalas CITES-R promediaron .69. Las asociaciones con otras medidas fueron en las direcciones predichas, a pesar de que la mayorı́a fueron modestas en tamaño. Las medidas del reporte parental no estuvieron virtualmente relacionadas con ninguna de las medidas del reporte del niño, incluyendo las CITES-R. Se observó cambio durante el tratamiento en casi todas las escalas de sı́ntomas.
Conclusiones: La adecuación psicométrica de la CITES-R fue modestamente apoyada. Las principales escalas del instrumento se comportaron bien. Hubo mayor variación en el comportamiento de las otras escalas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00257-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11414398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis ; Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology ; CITES-R ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Parent-Child Relations ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; PTSD ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sexual abuse ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Techniques and methods ; Tests and measures</subject><ispartof>Child abuse & neglect, 2001-03, Vol.25 (3), p.401-411</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-926e232e5f20fa11b84f2551d317608fb946d1a6edf647523c57120be87d3bc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-926e232e5f20fa11b84f2551d317608fb946d1a6edf647523c57120be87d3bc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00257-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=937824$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11414398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaffin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Shelli K.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised</title><title>Child abuse & neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Objective: To measure the internal consistency and construct validity of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R).
Method: 158 sexually abused children, ages 7–12, and a nonabusive parent or primary caretaker completed a series of measures, including the CITES-R. A subsample of 17 repeated the assessment after 1 to 2 months with intervening treatment.
Results: Internal consistency for the CITES-R scales averaged .69. Associations with other measures were in predicted directions, although most were modest in size. Parent-report measures were virtually unrelated to any child-report measure, including the CITES-R. Change over time during treatment was noted on most symptom scales.
Conclusions: The psychometric adequacy of the CITES-R was moderately supported. The main symptom scales of the instrument performed well. The performance of other scales was more variable.
Objetivo: Medir la consistencia interna y construir la validez de la Escala para Niños del Impacto de Eventos Traumáticos Revisada (Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised CITES-R).
Método: 158 niños abusados sexualmente, de edad 7 a 12 años, y un padre/madre no abusivo o el cuidador primario completaron una serie de medidas, incluyendo el CITES-R. Una sub-muestra de 17 repitieron la evaluación después de 1 a 2 meses de transcurrido el tratamiento.
Resultados: La consistencia interna de las escalas CITES-R promediaron .69. Las asociaciones con otras medidas fueron en las direcciones predichas, a pesar de que la mayorı́a fueron modestas en tamaño. Las medidas del reporte parental no estuvieron virtualmente relacionadas con ninguna de las medidas del reporte del niño, incluyendo las CITES-R. Se observó cambio durante el tratamiento en casi todas las escalas de sı́ntomas.
Conclusiones: La adecuación psicométrica de la CITES-R fue modestamente apoyada. Las principales escalas del instrumento se comportaron bien. Hubo mayor variación en el comportamiento de las otras escalas.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology</subject><subject>CITES-R</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Parent-Child Relations</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>PTSD</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sexual abuse</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Tests and measures</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtKxDAUgOEgio6XR1AKguiimmvTrkQGbyAoOoK7kCYnTKSXMWkH3Pkavp5PYscZdGk2WeQ7SfgR2if4lGCSnT1hwkVKCePHGJ9gTIVMX9bQiOSSpVIKuY5Gv2QLbcf4ioclpNhEW4RwwlmRj9DkIb6baVtDF7xJYK6rXne-bZLWJd0UkvHUVzZA8_XxGZPbeqZNtziaBN3XAzTJ5RyaLiZPRleQPsLcR7C7aMPpKsLeat9Bz1eXk_FNend_fTu-uEsNp7hLC5oBZRSEo9hpQsqcOyoEsYzIDOeuLHhmic7AuoxLQZkRklBcQi4tKw1jO-hoee8stG89xE7VPhqoKt1A20clccFpnmcDFEtoQhtjAKdmwdc6vCuC1SKn-smpFq0Uxuonp3oZ5g5WD_RlDfZvatVvAIcroONQwAXdGB9_XcFkTvmgzpcKhhhzD0FF46ExYH0A0ynb-n8-8g2MQZGO</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Chaffin, Mark</creator><creator>Shultz, Shelli K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised</title><author>Chaffin, Mark ; Shultz, Shelli K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-926e232e5f20fa11b84f2551d317608fb946d1a6edf647523c57120be87d3bc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology</topic><topic>CITES-R</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Parent-Child Relations</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>PTSD</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sexual abuse</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Tests and measures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaffin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Shelli K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaffin, Mark</au><au>Shultz, Shelli K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric evaluation of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>401-411</pages><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><abstract>Objective: To measure the internal consistency and construct validity of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R).
Method: 158 sexually abused children, ages 7–12, and a nonabusive parent or primary caretaker completed a series of measures, including the CITES-R. A subsample of 17 repeated the assessment after 1 to 2 months with intervening treatment.
Results: Internal consistency for the CITES-R scales averaged .69. Associations with other measures were in predicted directions, although most were modest in size. Parent-report measures were virtually unrelated to any child-report measure, including the CITES-R. Change over time during treatment was noted on most symptom scales.
Conclusions: The psychometric adequacy of the CITES-R was moderately supported. The main symptom scales of the instrument performed well. The performance of other scales was more variable.
Objetivo: Medir la consistencia interna y construir la validez de la Escala para Niños del Impacto de Eventos Traumáticos Revisada (Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised CITES-R).
Método: 158 niños abusados sexualmente, de edad 7 a 12 años, y un padre/madre no abusivo o el cuidador primario completaron una serie de medidas, incluyendo el CITES-R. Una sub-muestra de 17 repitieron la evaluación después de 1 a 2 meses de transcurrido el tratamiento.
Resultados: La consistencia interna de las escalas CITES-R promediaron .69. Las asociaciones con otras medidas fueron en las direcciones predichas, a pesar de que la mayorı́a fueron modestas en tamaño. Las medidas del reporte parental no estuvieron virtualmente relacionadas con ninguna de las medidas del reporte del niño, incluyendo las CITES-R. Se observó cambio durante el tratamiento en casi todas las escalas de sı́ntomas.
Conclusiones: La adecuación psicométrica de la CITES-R fue modestamente apoyada. Las principales escalas del instrumento se comportaron bien. Hubo mayor variación en el comportamiento de las otras escalas.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11414398</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00257-X</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0145-2134 |
| ispartof | Child abuse & neglect, 2001-03, Vol.25 (3), p.401-411 |
| issn | 0145-2134 1873-7757 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70942886 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Child Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology CITES-R Female Humans Male Medical sciences Parent-Child Relations Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry PTSD Reproducibility of Results Severity of Illness Index Sexual abuse Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology Surveys and Questionnaires Techniques and methods Tests and measures |
| title | Psychometric evaluation of the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Children%E2%80%99s%20Impact%20of%20Traumatic%20Events%20Scale-Revised&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Chaffin,%20Mark&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=401-411&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00257-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70942886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70942886&rft_id=info:pmid/11414398&rft_els_id=S014521340000257X&rfr_iscdi=true |