Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements

Statement of problem. The introduction of resin-modified glass ionomer cements has expanded the choices of luting cements available to the clinician; however, few independent studies are available on the fracture toughness of the currently available resin-modified glass ionomer luting agents compare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2000-02, Vol.83 (2), p.204-209
Hauptverfasser: Knobloch, Lisa A., Kerby, Ronald E., Seghi, Robert, Berlin, Jeffrey S., Lee, Jeffrey S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Statement of problem. The introduction of resin-modified glass ionomer cements has expanded the choices of luting cements available to the clinician; however, few independent studies are available on the fracture toughness of the currently available resin-modified glass ionomer luting agents compared with the composite cements. Purpose. This investigation evaluated the relative fracture toughness (KIC) of 3 composite luting cements (Panavia 21, Enforce, and C&B Metabond), 3 resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements (Advance, Vitremer Luting, and Fuji Duet), and a conventional glass ionomer luting cement (Ketac-Cem) at 24-hour and 7-day storage times. Material and methods. KIC was determined by preparing minicompact test specimens (n = 8) with introduced precracks. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C + 2°C until testing. Testing was performed on an Instron testing machine at a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/min. Results. ANOVA (P
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80013-X