Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements
Statement of problem. The introduction of resin-modified glass ionomer cements has expanded the choices of luting cements available to the clinician; however, few independent studies are available on the fracture toughness of the currently available resin-modified glass ionomer luting agents compare...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2000-02, Vol.83 (2), p.204-209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Statement of problem. The introduction of resin-modified glass ionomer cements has expanded the choices of luting cements available to the clinician; however, few independent studies are available on the fracture toughness of the currently available resin-modified glass ionomer luting agents compared with the composite cements.
Purpose. This investigation evaluated the relative fracture toughness (KIC) of 3 composite luting cements (Panavia 21, Enforce, and C&B Metabond), 3 resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements (Advance, Vitremer Luting, and Fuji Duet), and a conventional glass ionomer luting cement (Ketac-Cem) at 24-hour and 7-day storage times.
Material and methods. KIC was determined by preparing minicompact test specimens (n = 8) with introduced precracks. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C + 2°C until testing. Testing was performed on an Instron testing machine at a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/min.
Results. ANOVA (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80013-X |