New calculation of internal Ca(2+) recirculation fraction from alternans decay of postextrasystolic potentiation

In our previous studies, we calculated the internal Ca(2+) recirculation fraction (RF) after obtaining the beat decay constant (tau(e)) of the monoexponential component in the postextrasystolic potentiation (PESP) of the alternans decay by curve fitting. However, this method sometimes suffers from t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of physiology 2001-04, Vol.51 (2), p.143-149
Hauptverfasser: Iribe, G, Araki, J, Mohri, S, Shimizu, J, Imaoka, T, Kanmura, Y, Kajiya, F, Suga, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In our previous studies, we calculated the internal Ca(2+) recirculation fraction (RF) after obtaining the beat decay constant (tau(e)) of the monoexponential component in the postextrasystolic potentiation (PESP) of the alternans decay by curve fitting. However, this method sometimes suffers from the sensitive variation of tau(e) with small noises in the measured contractilities of the 5th and 6th postextrasystolic (PES) beats in the tail of the exponential component. We now succeeded in preventing this problem by a new method to calculate RF without obtaining tau(e). The equation for the calculation in the new method expresses an alternans decay of PESP as a recurrence formula of PESP. It can calculate RF directly from the contractilities of the 1st through the 4th PES beats without any fitting procedure. To evaluate the reliability of the new method, we calculated RF from the alternans decay of PESP of the left ventricle (LV) of the canine excised cross-circulated heart preparation by both the original fitting and the new method. Although there was no significant difference in the mean value of the obtained RF between these two methods, the variance of RF was smaller with the new method than with the original method. Thus the new method proved useful and more reliable than the original fitting method.
ISSN:0021-521X
DOI:10.2170/jjphysiol.51.143