Assessment of passive respiratory mechanics in infants: double versus single occlusion?

The single breath or occlusion technique (SOT) is widely used to assess passive respiratory mechanics in infants, but depends on various underlying assumptions. Recently, it has been proposed that such measurements could be internally validated by performing two brief airway occlusions during the sa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European respiratory journal 2001-03, Vol.17 (3), p.449-455
Hauptverfasser: Goetz, I, Hoo, A.F, Lum, S, Stocks, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The single breath or occlusion technique (SOT) is widely used to assess passive respiratory mechanics in infants, but depends on various underlying assumptions. Recently, it has been proposed that such measurements could be internally validated by performing two brief airway occlusions during the same expiration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the double occlusion technique (DOT) using a new commercially available program (Jaeger MasterScreen BabyBody Erich Jaeger GmbH, Würzburg, Germany). Paired measurements of respiratory system compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs) using both SOT and DOT were obtained in 18 healthy sedated infants (age range 4-41 weeks, weight 2.7-9.9 kg). There was close agreement between both methods of assessing Crs in all infants, the mean within-subject difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) for DOT-SOT being -0.06 (-0.55- +0.42) mL x kPa(-1) x kg(-1). By contrast, estimates of Rrs,DO were on average 20% lower than those for Rrs,SO, (mean within-subject difference (95% CI) being -0.67 (-1.04- -0.31) kPa x L(-1) x s; p
ISSN:0903-1936
1399-3003
DOI:10.1183/09031936.01.17304490