Fetal nucleated erythrocyte recovery: Fluorescence activated cell sorting‐based positive selection using anti‐gamma globin versus magnetic activated cell sorting using anti‐CD45 depletion and anti‐gamma globin positive selection

BACKGROUND Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)‐based anti‐gamma (γ) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)‐based anti‐CD45 depletion followed by anti‐γ positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cytometry (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2000-03, Vol.39 (3), p.224-230
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Ji Yi, Zhen, Dong Kai, Falco, Vincent M., Farina, Antonio, Zheng, Yuen Ling, Delli‐Bovi, L.C., Bianchi, Diana W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)‐based anti‐gamma (γ) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)‐based anti‐CD45 depletion followed by anti‐γ positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue. METHODS Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti‐γ positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty‐four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells. RESULTS The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH. Cytometry 39:224–230, 2000 © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0196-4763
1097-0320
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(20000301)39:3<224::AID-CYTO8>3.0.CO;2-J