Selective use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in a chest pain center

Emergency department chest pain centers (CPCs) vary in their approach to patients with chest pain and nonischemic electrocardiograms (ECG). Although single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging has been evaluated in this setting, both acutely at rest and after stre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2001-06, Vol.87 (12), p.1351-1355
Hauptverfasser: Abbott, Brian G, Abdel-Aziz, Islam, Nagula, Satish, Monico, Edward P, Schriver, John A, Wackers, Frans J.Th
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Emergency department chest pain centers (CPCs) vary in their approach to patients with chest pain and nonischemic electrocardiograms (ECG). Although single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging has been evaluated in this setting, both acutely at rest and after stress, we questioned its application in all patients. We prospectively evaluated the utility of selective SPECT imaging in a CPC (i.e., rest SPECT for ongoing pain, stress SPECT if unable to undergo exercise electrocardiography) and its impact on the overall disposition of all emergency department chest pain patients. Over 3 years, 2,601 patients were evaluated in a CPC (2,211 [85%] were sent home, 390 [15%] were hospitalized). Of 390 CPC patients hospitalized, 182 (47%) were diagnosed with coronary artery disease at the time of hospital discharge. Only 28 patients (1.1%) had an acute myocardial infarction. After 3 years, the proportion of all chest pain patients hospitalized and those diagnosed as “rule-out myocardial infarction” decreased from 53% to 41% and 32% to 18% of all chest pain patients, respectively (both p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01551-X