Who benefits from treatment and rehabilitation in a stroke unit? A community-based study

The beneficial effects of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with acute stroke in a dedicated stroke unit (SU) are well established. We wanted to examine if these effects are limited to certain groups of patients or if they apply to all patients independent of age, sex, comorbidity, and initia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stroke (1970) 2000-02, Vol.31 (2), p.434-439
Hauptverfasser: JØRGENSEN, H. S, KAMMERSGAARD, L. P, HOUTH, J, NAKAYAMA, H, RAASCHOU, H. O, LARSEN, K, HÜBBE, P, OLSEN, T. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The beneficial effects of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with acute stroke in a dedicated stroke unit (SU) are well established. We wanted to examine if these effects are limited to certain groups of patients or if they apply to all patients independent of age, sex, comorbidity, and initial stroke severity. This was a community-based study of outcome in 1241 consecutive stroke patients from 2 communities in Copenhagen: In one (Frederiksberg), treatment and rehabilitation were given in general neurological and medical wards (GW), and in the other (Bispebjerg) in one single large SU. Outcome measures were initial, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates, a poor outcome (initial death or discharge to a nursing home), and length of hospital stay (LOHS). Multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the independent effect of SU treatment on the various subgroups. The relative risks of initial death, poor outcome, and 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were reduced by 40% on average in patients treated in the SU compared with the GW. A beneficial effect of SU treatment was observed regardless of the patient's age, sex, comorbidity, and initial stroke severity. Those who benefited most appeared to be the patients with the most severe strokes (poor outcome: OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.58). Those who benefited least were patients with mild or moderate strokes (poor outcome: OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98) and patients
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/01.STR.31.2.434