Physiological effects of constant versus variable power during endurance cycling

Previous theoretical research found that varying power slightly to counter external conditions may result in improved performance during cycling time trialing, but it is not known whether such power variations result in added physiological stress. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 1999-10, Vol.31 (10), p.1472-1477
Hauptverfasser: LIEDL, M. A, SWAIN, D. P, BRANCH, J. D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous theoretical research found that varying power slightly to counter external conditions may result in improved performance during cycling time trialing, but it is not known whether such power variations result in added physiological stress. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether variable power (VP) cycling produced greater physiological stress than constant power (CP) cycling of the same mean intensity. Eight trained male cyclists (age 28 +/- 2 yr, mass 74.4 +/- 2.3 kg, VO2max 4.24 +/- 0.13 L x min(-1), weekly training 277 +/- 44 km) performed three 1-h ergometer trials. The first trial was performed at a self-paced maximal effort. The mean power from that trial was used to determine the power for the CP trial (constant effort at mean power) and the VP trial (alternating +/- 5% of mean power every 5 min). No differences were found between the CP and VP trials in mean VO2 (CP 3.33 +/- 0.11 L x min(-1), VP 3.26 +/- 0.12 L x min(-1)), mean heart rate (CP 158 +/- 3 min(-1), VP 159 +/- 3 min(-1)), mean blood lactate concentration (CP 4.2 +/- 0.7 mM, VP 4.3 +/- 0.7 mM), or mean RPE (CP 13.9 +/- 0.4, VP 14.1 +/- 0.4). Therefore, during a strenuous 1-h effort (78% of VO2max), subjects experienced no additional physiological stress by varying power +/- 5% compared with that during a constant power effort.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1097/00005768-199910000-00018