Quantitative evaluation of the expression of MAGE genes in tumors by limiting dilution of cDNA libraries

The MAGE‐A genes are expressed in tumor cells but not in healthy tissues, except in male germ line cells and in placenta. They encode tumor‐specific antigens recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs). On the basis of semi‐quantitative reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 1999-11, Vol.83 (5), p.664-669
Hauptverfasser: Serrano, Alfonso, Lethé, Bernard, Delroisse, Jean‐Marc, Lurquin, Christophe, De Plaen, Etienne, Brasseur, Francis, Rimoldi, Donata, Boon, Thierry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The MAGE‐A genes are expressed in tumor cells but not in healthy tissues, except in male germ line cells and in placenta. They encode tumor‐specific antigens recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs). On the basis of semi‐quantitative reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) assays, 6 of the 12 members of the MAGE‐A family, including MAGE‐A1, were previously reported to have a high level of expression in tumors, whereas 5 other members, including MAGE‐A10, were expressed at a much lower level, deemed to be insufficient for CTL recognition. However, analysis with antibodies has shown that some melanoma cell lines contain equivalent amounts of MAGE‐A1 and MAGE‐A10 proteins. This discrepancy appeared to be due to the low efficacy of the primers that had been used for the previous MAGE‐A10 RT‐PCR assays. This led us to develop a method that is independent of the efficacy of the PCR primers to evaluate MAGE‐A gene expression. cDNA libraries from tumor cell lines were introduced into bacteria, of which 200 pools of about 500 bacteria were maintained in microcultures. The frequencies of the MAGE‐A cDNA clones in each library were evaluated by performing PCR assays on each of these pools. The abundance of MAGE‐A10 cDNAs was found to be similar to that of MAGE‐A1 in 3 of the libraries that were analyzed, including 2 with high expression (1/6,400), confirming that MAGE‐A10 is expressed at a high level. MAGE‐A2, A3, A4, A6 and A12 cDNAs were also confirmed often to be present at a frequency of more than 1/10,000, a level of expression that should suffice for recognition of antigenic peptides encoded by these genes by cytolytic T cells. The remaining MAGE genes are either not expressed in tumors or are expressed at a very low level, with the exception of MAGE‐A8 and 11, which show high expression in a very small number of tumors. This method also allowed us to isolate 5 MAGE‐A cDNAs that we had not obtained previously, enabling us to delineate the exons in the sequences of genes MAGE‐A5, A8, A9, A10 and A11. Int. J. Cancer 83:664–669, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991126)83:5<664::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-V