Oxidation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid by UV radiation and by TiO2/UV radiation: comparison and modelling of reaction kinetic

The phenolic compound p-hydroxybenzoic acid is very common in a great variety of agroindustrial wastewaters (olive oil and table olive industries, distilleries). The objective of this work was to study the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 towards the decomposition of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. In order t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hazardous materials 2001-05, Vol.83 (3), p.255-264
Hauptverfasser: DE HEREDIA, Jesus Beltran, TORREGROSA, Joaquin, DOMINGUEZ, Joaquin R, PERES, Jose A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The phenolic compound p-hydroxybenzoic acid is very common in a great variety of agroindustrial wastewaters (olive oil and table olive industries, distilleries). The objective of this work was to study the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 towards the decomposition of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. In order to demonstrate the greater oxidizing power of the photocatalytic system and to quantify the additional levels of degradation attained, we performed experiments on the oxidation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid by UV radiation alone and by the TiO2/UV radiation combination. A kinetic model is applied for the photooxidation by UV radiation and by the TiO(2)/UV system. Experimental results indicated that the kinetics for both oxidation processes can be fitted well by a pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The second oxidation process can be explained in terms of the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model. The values of the adsorption equilibrium constant, K(pHB), and the second order kinetic rate constant, k(c), were 0.37 ppm(-1) and 6.99 ppm min(-1), respectively. Finally, a comparison between the kinetic rate constants for two oxidation systems reveals that the constants for the TiO2/UV system are clearly greater (between 220-435%) than those obtained in the direct UV photooxidation.
ISSN:0304-3894
1873-3336
DOI:10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00194-7