Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2001-05, Vol.136 (5), p.563-568
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Sandra L, Edwards, Michael J, Chao, Celia, Tuttle, Todd M, Noyes, R. Dirk, Woo, Claudine, Cerrito, Patricia B, McMasters, Kelly M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 568
container_issue 5
container_start_page 563
container_title Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)
container_volume 136
creator Wong, Sandra L
Edwards, Michael J
Chao, Celia
Tuttle, Todd M
Noyes, R. Dirk
Woo, Claudine
Cerrito, Patricia B
McMasters, Kelly M
description BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P
doi_str_mv 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70822987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>391443</ama_id><sourcerecordid>70822987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-7b80678bc1ad69f5096edc22da3c5565b7d09683cab439ddd338c0c49da0178b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EoqXwA-CAIg7cErwmDreqYpPKIgFny7GdNlUWsBOJ_nsGWkDi5PG8741mHkInBCcEY3KhvVmGwS8SwtJEJCJlO2hMBJMxSznfRWOMMY-BxCN0EMIKKipzuo9GhDDOBJdjNH_yzlamr9pF1C9d9NzrfghRV37_Hro2uBZEV0fTj6qutV9D07pwGU2j-6HuKwO68-Ab7PoQ7ZW6Du5o-07Q6_XVy-w2nj_e3M2m81jTXPRxVkicZrIwRNs0LwXOU2cNpVYzI0QqisxCSzKjC85yay1j0mDDc6sxAR-boPPN3DffvQ8u9KqpgnGwXuu6IagMS0pzmQF49g9cdYNvYTdFGRUCKAEQ3UDGdyF4V6o3XzVwqSJYfQWtfoJWELQSCoIG0-l28lA0zv5ZtskCcLwBdKN_VZYTzhn7BPrugv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232552295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wong, Sandra L ; Edwards, Michael J ; Chao, Celia ; Tuttle, Todd M ; Noyes, R. Dirk ; Woo, Claudine ; Cerrito, Patricia B ; McMasters, Kelly M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sandra L ; Edwards, Michael J ; Chao, Celia ; Tuttle, Todd M ; Noyes, R. Dirk ; Woo, Claudine ; Cerrito, Patricia B ; McMasters, Kelly M ; University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P&lt;.001, χ2 test). Increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs were also associated with the presence 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size and the number of positive SLNs were independent factors predicting the presence of positive NSNs. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of positive NSNs correlates with increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs. However, even patients with small primary tumors have a substantial risk of residual axillary nodal disease after SLN biopsy. These data will be helpful in counseling patients regarding the need for completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN is identified.Arch Surg. 2001;136:563-568--&gt;</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0010</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11343548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Logistic Models ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><ispartof>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2001-05, Vol.136 (5), p.563-568</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association May 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11343548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyes, R. Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Claudine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrito, Patricia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMasters, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</title><title>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</title><addtitle>Arch Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P&lt;.001, χ2 test). Increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs were also associated with the presence 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size and the number of positive SLNs were independent factors predicting the presence of positive NSNs. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of positive NSNs correlates with increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs. However, even patients with small primary tumors have a substantial risk of residual axillary nodal disease after SLN biopsy. These data will be helpful in counseling patients regarding the need for completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN is identified.Arch Surg. 2001;136:563-568--&gt;</description><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><issn>0004-0010</issn><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>1538-3644</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EoqXwA-CAIg7cErwmDreqYpPKIgFny7GdNlUWsBOJ_nsGWkDi5PG8741mHkInBCcEY3KhvVmGwS8SwtJEJCJlO2hMBJMxSznfRWOMMY-BxCN0EMIKKipzuo9GhDDOBJdjNH_yzlamr9pF1C9d9NzrfghRV37_Hro2uBZEV0fTj6qutV9D07pwGU2j-6HuKwO68-Ab7PoQ7ZW6Du5o-07Q6_XVy-w2nj_e3M2m81jTXPRxVkicZrIwRNs0LwXOU2cNpVYzI0QqisxCSzKjC85yay1j0mDDc6sxAR-boPPN3DffvQ8u9KqpgnGwXuu6IagMS0pzmQF49g9cdYNvYTdFGRUCKAEQ3UDGdyF4V6o3XzVwqSJYfQWtfoJWELQSCoIG0-l28lA0zv5ZtskCcLwBdKN_VZYTzhn7BPrugv8</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Wong, Sandra L</creator><creator>Edwards, Michael J</creator><creator>Chao, Celia</creator><creator>Tuttle, Todd M</creator><creator>Noyes, R. Dirk</creator><creator>Woo, Claudine</creator><creator>Cerrito, Patricia B</creator><creator>McMasters, Kelly M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</title><author>Wong, Sandra L ; Edwards, Michael J ; Chao, Celia ; Tuttle, Todd M ; Noyes, R. Dirk ; Woo, Claudine ; Cerrito, Patricia B ; McMasters, Kelly M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-7b80678bc1ad69f5096edc22da3c5565b7d09683cab439ddd338c0c49da0178b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyes, R. Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Claudine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrito, Patricia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMasters, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Sandra L</au><au>Edwards, Michael J</au><au>Chao, Celia</au><au>Tuttle, Todd M</au><au>Noyes, R. Dirk</au><au>Woo, Claudine</au><au>Cerrito, Patricia B</au><au>McMasters, Kelly M</au><aucorp>University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>563-568</pages><issn>0004-0010</issn><issn>2168-6254</issn><eissn>1538-3644</eissn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P&lt;.001, χ2 test). Increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs were also associated with the presence 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size and the number of positive SLNs were independent factors predicting the presence of positive NSNs. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of positive NSNs correlates with increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs. However, even patients with small primary tumors have a substantial risk of residual axillary nodal disease after SLN biopsy. These data will be helpful in counseling patients regarding the need for completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN is identified.Arch Surg. 2001;136:563-568--&gt;</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>11343548</pmid><doi>10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0010
ispartof Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2001-05, Vol.136 (5), p.563-568
issn 0004-0010
2168-6254
1538-3644
2168-6262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70822987
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Axilla
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Logistic Models
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
title Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20the%20Status%20of%20the%20Nonsentinel%20Axillary%20Nodes:%20A%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20surgery%20(Chicago.%201960)&rft.au=Wong,%20Sandra%20L&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20Louisville%20Breast%20Cancer%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=563-568&rft.issn=0004-0010&rft.eissn=1538-3644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70822987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232552295&rft_id=info:pmid/11343548&rft_ama_id=391443&rfr_iscdi=true