Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2001-05, Vol.136 (5), p.563-568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 568 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 563 |
container_title | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Wong, Sandra L Edwards, Michael J Chao, Celia Tuttle, Todd M Noyes, R. Dirk Woo, Claudine Cerrito, Patricia B McMasters, Kelly M |
description | BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70822987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>391443</ama_id><sourcerecordid>70822987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-7b80678bc1ad69f5096edc22da3c5565b7d09683cab439ddd338c0c49da0178b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EoqXwA-CAIg7cErwmDreqYpPKIgFny7GdNlUWsBOJ_nsGWkDi5PG8741mHkInBCcEY3KhvVmGwS8SwtJEJCJlO2hMBJMxSznfRWOMMY-BxCN0EMIKKipzuo9GhDDOBJdjNH_yzlamr9pF1C9d9NzrfghRV37_Hro2uBZEV0fTj6qutV9D07pwGU2j-6HuKwO68-Ab7PoQ7ZW6Du5o-07Q6_XVy-w2nj_e3M2m81jTXPRxVkicZrIwRNs0LwXOU2cNpVYzI0QqisxCSzKjC85yay1j0mDDc6sxAR-boPPN3DffvQ8u9KqpgnGwXuu6IagMS0pzmQF49g9cdYNvYTdFGRUCKAEQ3UDGdyF4V6o3XzVwqSJYfQWtfoJWELQSCoIG0-l28lA0zv5ZtskCcLwBdKN_VZYTzhn7BPrugv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232552295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wong, Sandra L ; Edwards, Michael J ; Chao, Celia ; Tuttle, Todd M ; Noyes, R. Dirk ; Woo, Claudine ; Cerrito, Patricia B ; McMasters, Kelly M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sandra L ; Edwards, Michael J ; Chao, Celia ; Tuttle, Todd M ; Noyes, R. Dirk ; Woo, Claudine ; Cerrito, Patricia B ; McMasters, Kelly M ; University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P<.001, χ2 test). Increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs were also associated with the presence 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size and the number of positive SLNs were independent factors predicting the presence of positive NSNs. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of positive NSNs correlates with increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs. However, even patients with small primary tumors have a substantial risk of residual axillary nodal disease after SLN biopsy. These data will be helpful in counseling patients regarding the need for completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN is identified.Arch Surg. 2001;136:563-568--></description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0010</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11343548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Logistic Models ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><ispartof>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2001-05, Vol.136 (5), p.563-568</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association May 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11343548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyes, R. Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Claudine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrito, Patricia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMasters, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</title><title>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</title><addtitle>Arch Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P<.001, χ2 test). Increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs were also associated with the presence 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size and the number of positive SLNs were independent factors predicting the presence of positive NSNs. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of positive NSNs correlates with increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs. However, even patients with small primary tumors have a substantial risk of residual axillary nodal disease after SLN biopsy. These data will be helpful in counseling patients regarding the need for completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN is identified.Arch Surg. 2001;136:563-568--></description><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><issn>0004-0010</issn><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>1538-3644</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EoqXwA-CAIg7cErwmDreqYpPKIgFny7GdNlUWsBOJ_nsGWkDi5PG8741mHkInBCcEY3KhvVmGwS8SwtJEJCJlO2hMBJMxSznfRWOMMY-BxCN0EMIKKipzuo9GhDDOBJdjNH_yzlamr9pF1C9d9NzrfghRV37_Hro2uBZEV0fTj6qutV9D07pwGU2j-6HuKwO68-Ab7PoQ7ZW6Du5o-07Q6_XVy-w2nj_e3M2m81jTXPRxVkicZrIwRNs0LwXOU2cNpVYzI0QqisxCSzKjC85yay1j0mDDc6sxAR-boPPN3DffvQ8u9KqpgnGwXuu6IagMS0pzmQF49g9cdYNvYTdFGRUCKAEQ3UDGdyF4V6o3XzVwqSJYfQWtfoJWELQSCoIG0-l28lA0zv5ZtskCcLwBdKN_VZYTzhn7BPrugv8</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Wong, Sandra L</creator><creator>Edwards, Michael J</creator><creator>Chao, Celia</creator><creator>Tuttle, Todd M</creator><creator>Noyes, R. Dirk</creator><creator>Woo, Claudine</creator><creator>Cerrito, Patricia B</creator><creator>McMasters, Kelly M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</title><author>Wong, Sandra L ; Edwards, Michael J ; Chao, Celia ; Tuttle, Todd M ; Noyes, R. Dirk ; Woo, Claudine ; Cerrito, Patricia B ; McMasters, Kelly M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-7b80678bc1ad69f5096edc22da3c5565b7d09683cab439ddd338c0c49da0178b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyes, R. Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Claudine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerrito, Patricia B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMasters, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Sandra L</au><au>Edwards, Michael J</au><au>Chao, Celia</au><au>Tuttle, Todd M</au><au>Noyes, R. Dirk</au><au>Woo, Claudine</au><au>Cerrito, Patricia B</au><au>McMasters, Kelly M</au><aucorp>University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>563-568</pages><issn>0004-0010</issn><issn>2168-6254</issn><eissn>1538-3644</eissn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides accurate nodal staging information. The need for completion axillary dissection after finding a positive SLN for breast cancer has been questioned. HYPOTHESIS The presence of nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases in the axillary dissection specimen correlates with tumor size, the number of SLNs removed, and the number of positive SLNs. DESIGN Prospective, multi-institutional study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a nationwide study involving 148 surgeons. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. All SLNs were evaluated histologically at a minimum of 2-mm intervals. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies for cytokeratin was performed at the discretion of each participating institution. All NSNs were evaluated by routine histologic examination. RESULTS An SLN was identified in 1268 (90%) of 1415 patients. Increasing tumor size was significantly correlated with increasing likelihood of positive NSNs: T1a, 14%; T1b, 22%; T1c, 30%; T2, 45%; and T3, 57% (P = .002, χ2 test). The presence of positive NSNs was not significantly associated with the number of SLNs removed. Patients with more than 1 positive SLN were more likely to have positive NSNs than those with only 1 positive SLN (50% vs 32%; P<.001, χ2 test). Increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs were also associated with the presence 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that tumor size and the number of positive SLNs were independent factors predicting the presence of positive NSNs. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of positive NSNs correlates with increasing tumor size and the presence of multiple positive SLNs. However, even patients with small primary tumors have a substantial risk of residual axillary nodal disease after SLN biopsy. These data will be helpful in counseling patients regarding the need for completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN is identified.Arch Surg. 2001;136:563-568--></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>11343548</pmid><doi>10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0010 |
ispartof | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2001-05, Vol.136 (5), p.563-568 |
issn | 0004-0010 2168-6254 1538-3644 2168-6262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70822987 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Axilla Breast Neoplasms - pathology Female Humans Immunohistochemistry Logistic Models Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy |
title | Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20the%20Status%20of%20the%20Nonsentinel%20Axillary%20Nodes:%20A%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20surgery%20(Chicago.%201960)&rft.au=Wong,%20Sandra%20L&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20Louisville%20Breast%20Cancer%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=563-568&rft.issn=0004-0010&rft.eissn=1538-3644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.136.5.563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70822987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232552295&rft_id=info:pmid/11343548&rft_ama_id=391443&rfr_iscdi=true |