In vitro sperm-binding assay to distinguish differences in populations of human sperm or damage to sperm resulting from cryopreservation

Annually, >1.3 million men are members of couples seeking help because of infertility. Semen from many of these men contains reasonable numbers of motile and normal sperm, but for a subset of individuals, many sperm are deficient in ability to bind to the zona pellucida during in vitro fertilizat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of andrology 1999-09, Vol.20 (5), p.648-654
Hauptverfasser: Amann, R. P, Shabanowitz, R. B, Huszar, G, Broder, S. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Annually, >1.3 million men are members of couples seeking help because of infertility. Semen from many of these men contains reasonable numbers of motile and normal sperm, but for a subset of individuals, many sperm are deficient in ability to bind to the zona pellucida during in vitro fertilization. Diagnosis of this defect has been hampered by lack of a low‐cost test. Molecular similarity exists between the perivitelline membrane of a hen's egg and the mammalian zona pellucida. These facts and some preliminary data led to evaluation of binding of human sperm during incubation for 60 minutes at 37°C to an extract of chicken perivitelline membrane coated in microwell assay plates. The sperm‐binding assay had inter‐and intraassay plate variations of 21 and 12%, respectively, using washed fresh sperm. All seminal samples were normal, except a few that had 36 to 50% motile sperm with a low rate of sperm movement (if there is a low rate of movement, World Health Organization [WHO] criterion for normalcy is >50% motile). Nevertheless, this sperm‐binding assay detected differences among individuals in percentage of sperm bound. Based on data for two to four ejaculates from each of eight occasional sperm donors, the coefficient of variation for ejaculates within donor averaged 31%, and means for the donors differed (P < 0.02). Percentage of sperm bound ranged from
ISSN:0196-3635
1939-4640
DOI:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1999.tb02567.x