Comparison of vagal baroreflex function in nonpregnant women and in women with normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, or gestational hypertension

Objective: Our aim was to compare baroreflex function among nonpregnant women and among women with normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, or gestational hypertension. Study Design: Baroreflex function was tested in 20 women with preeclampsia, in 20 age- and gestational age–matched normotensive gravid women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001-05, Vol.184 (6), p.1189-1195
Hauptverfasser: Silver, Helayne M., Tahvanainen, Kari U.O., Kuusela, Tom A., Eckberg, Dwain L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Our aim was to compare baroreflex function among nonpregnant women and among women with normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, or gestational hypertension. Study Design: Baroreflex function was tested in 20 women with preeclampsia, in 20 age- and gestational age–matched normotensive gravid women, in 20 age-matched nonpregnant women, and in 20 nonmatched women with gestational hypertension. The baroreflex was measured by several modalities. Results: Vagal baroreflex gain measured by cross-spectral analysis of parallel spontaneous heart rate and blood pressure changes is significantly decreased in normal pregnancy (15.8 ± 7.2 vs 10.8 ± 4.1 ms/mm Hg; P = 0.001), in comparison with vagal baroreflex gain in nonpregnant women. Baroreflex gain is further reduced in preeclamptic pregnancy (10.8 ± 4.1 vs 7.2 ± 2.6 ms/mm Hg; P = 0.003) and in gestational hypertension (10.8 ± 4.1 vs 6.5 ± 2.7 ms/mm Hg; P = 0.001), compared with that in normal pregnancy. Similar differences were seen with other baroreflex testing modalities. Conclusions: The normal reduction of baroreflex gain in pregnancy is further depressed in subjects with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1189-95.)
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1067/mob.2001.112871