A Prospective Study of Lycopene and Tomato Product Intake and Risk of Prostate Cancer
Background: Dietary lycopene and tomato products may reduce risk of prostate cancer; however, uncertainty remains about this possible association. Methods: We evaluated the association between intake of lycopene and specific tomato products and prostate cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2006-01, Vol.15 (1), p.92-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Dietary lycopene and tomato products may reduce risk of prostate cancer; however, uncertainty remains about this
possible association.
Methods: We evaluated the association between intake of lycopene and specific tomato products and prostate cancer risk in
the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, a multicenter study designed to investigate cancer early
detection methods and etiologic determinants. Participants completed both a general risk factor and a 137-item food frequency
questionnaire at baseline. A total of 1,338 cases of prostate cancer were identified among 29,361 men during an average of
4.2 years of follow-up.
Results: Lycopene intake was not associated with prostate cancer risk. Reduced risks were also not found for total tomato
servings or for most tomato-based foods. Statistically nonsignificant inverse associations were noted for pizza [all prostate
cancer: relative risk (RR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.67-1.03 for ≥1 serving/wk versus < 0.5 serving/mo; P trend = 0.06 and advanced prostate cancer: RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.10; P trend = 0.12] and spaghetti/tomato sauce consumption (advanced prostate cancer: RR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.57-1.16 for ≥2 servings/wk
versus < 1 serving/mo; P trend = 0.31). Among men with a family history of prostate cancer, risks were decreased in relation to increased consumption of
lycopene ( P trend = 0.04) and specific tomato-based foods commonly eaten with fat (spaghetti, P trend = 0.12; pizza, P trend = 0.15; lasagna, P trend = 0.02).
Conclusions: This large study does not support the hypothesis that greater lycopene/tomato product consumption protects from
prostate cancer. Evidence for protective associations in subjects with a family history of prostate cancer requires further
corroboration. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(1):92–8) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0563 |