Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small st jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position

The impact of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch (P-PtM) on long-term survival is unclear. Between 1985 and 2000, 388 patients at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with 19- or 21-mm St Jude Medical prostheses and had transthoracic echocardiography within 1 year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2006-01, Vol.113 (3), p.420-426
Hauptverfasser: MOHTY-ECHAHIDI, Dania, MALOUF, Joseph F, GIRARD, Steve E, SCHAFF, Hartzell V, GRILL, Diane E, ENRIQUEZ-SARANO, Maurice E, MILLER, Fletcher A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The impact of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch (P-PtM) on long-term survival is unclear. Between 1985 and 2000, 388 patients at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with 19- or 21-mm St Jude Medical prostheses and had transthoracic echocardiography within 1 year after AVR. Mean age of patients was 62+/-13 years; 69% were female. Prosthesis effective orifice area (EOA) was derived from the continuity equation. P-PtM was classified as severe (indexed EOA < or =0.60 cm2/m2), moderate (0.60 cm2/m20.85 cm2/m2). P-PtM was severe in 66 patients (17%), moderate in 168 (43%), and not hemodynamically significant in 154 (40%). Patients with severe P-PtM had a significantly larger body surface area (P
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.546754