Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: A 3-dimensional surface profilometry study
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of sandblasting to remove composite remnants after orthodontic bracket debonding. Methods: The sample consisted of 20 human premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes. The buccal surface of each premolar was divided into 3 parts:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2007-07, Vol.132 (1), p.71-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of sandblasting to remove composite remnants after orthodontic bracket debonding. Methods: The sample consisted of 20 human premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes. The buccal surface of each premolar was divided into 3 parts: the upper half (control surface group, CS), the lower half left (LS group), and the lower half right (SS group). A composite resin paste (volume, 5 × 3 × 1 mm3 ) was bonded onto the LS and SS surfaces. Then it was removed by using 1 of 2 methods: low-speed handpiece with tungsten carbide bur in the LS group and sandblasting in the SS group. Temperature change and removal time were recorded, and surface profiles were examined with 3-dimensional profilometry. Results: An independent t test showed a statistically significant difference in temperature change between the LS and SS groups ( P .5). Conclusions: The results suggest that intraoral sandblasting might be an alternative to rotatory instruments for resin remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.027 |