Haptic Identification of Surfaces as Fields of Force
1 Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago; and 2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, 3 Laboratory for Intelligent Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, and 4 Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois Submitted 13 June 20...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2006-02, Vol.95 (2), p.1068-1077 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago; and 2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, 3 Laboratory for Intelligent Mechanical Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, and 4 Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Submitted 13 June 2005;
accepted in final form 29 September 2005
The ability to discriminate an object's shape and mechanical properties from touch is one of the most fundamental somatosensory functions. When exploring physical properties of an object, such as stiffness and curvature, humans probe the object's surface and obtain information from the many sensory receptors in their upper limbs. This sensory information is critical for the guidance of actions. We studied how humans acquire an internal representation of the shape and mechanical properties of surfaces and how this information affects the execution of trajectories over the surface. Experiments involved subjects executing trajectories while holding a planar manipulandum that renders planar virtual objects with variable shape and mechanical properties. Subjects were instructed to make reaching movements with the hand between points on the boundary of a curved virtual disk of varying stiffness and curvature. The results suggest two classifications of adaptive responses: force perturbations and object boundaries. In the first case, a rectilinear hand movement is enforced by opposing the interaction forces. In the second case, the trajectory conforms to the object boundary so as to reduce interaction forces. While this dichotomy is evident for very rigid and very soft objects, the likelihood of an object boundary classification depended, in a smooth and monotonic way, on the average force experienced during the initial movements. Furthermore, the observed response across a variety of stiffness values lead to a constant average interaction force after adaptation. This suggests that the nervous system may select from the two responses through a mechanism that attempts to establish a constant interaction force.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. S. Chib, 345 East Superior St., Suite 1406, Chicago, IL 60611 (E-mail: v-chib{at}northwestern.edu ) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.00610.2005 |