Different factor loadings for SF36: The Strong Heart Study and the National Survey of Functional Health Status

To increase our understanding of the psychometric characteristics and factor structure of the SF36® in older American Indian populations. Between 1993 and 1995, SF36® data were collected from 3,488 Phase II participants of the Strong Heart Study (SHS) between the ages of 48 and 81. Comparison data w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.208-215
Hauptverfasser: Beals, Janette, Welty, Thomas K., Mitchell, Christina M., Rhoades, Dorothy A., Yeh, Jeun-Liang, Henderson, Jeffrey A., Manson, Spero M., Buchwald, Dedra S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To increase our understanding of the psychometric characteristics and factor structure of the SF36® in older American Indian populations. Between 1993 and 1995, SF36® data were collected from 3,488 Phase II participants of the Strong Heart Study (SHS) between the ages of 48 and 81. Comparison data were provided by an age- and gender-matched sample ( n = 695) from the National Survey of Functional Health Status (NSFHS) conducted in 1989 and 1990. Generally, the basic psychometric analyses showed that the SF36® performed adequately in these older American Indians. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that a one-factor model best fit the data for both older groups. On the other hand, confirmatory factor analyses showed that a two-factor model with correlated factors provided a superior fit to the data than a one-factor model. An assumption of equivalent factor loadings for the SHS and NSFHS groups was untenable. These analyses demonstrate that use of summary scores assuming a differentiated physical/mental functioning structure is likely improper in at least some populations. The SF36® provides an important opportunity to understand cultural differences in the conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.010