A Biomechanical Evaluation of an Anatomical Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction
Background: Despite numerous surgical techniques described, there have been few studies evaluating the biomechanical performance of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions. Purpose: To compare a newly developed anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2006-02, Vol.34 (2), p.236-246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Despite numerous surgical techniques described, there have been few studies evaluating the biomechanical performance of acromioclavicular
joint reconstructions.
Purpose: To compare a newly developed anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure and
a recently described arthroscopic method using ultrastrong nonabsorbable suture material.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Forty-two fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (72.8 ± 13.4 years) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: arthroscopic reconstruction,
anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction, and a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. Bone mineral density was obtained on all
specimens. Specimens were tested to 70 N in 3 directions, anterior, posterior, and superior, comparing the intact to the reconstructed
states. Superior cyclic loading at 70 N for 3000 cycles was then performed at a rate of 1 Hz, followed by a load to failure
test (120 mm/min) to simulate physiologic states at the acromioclavicular joint.
Results: In comparison to the intact state, the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure had significantly ( P < .05) greater laxity than the anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction or the arthroscopic reconstruction. There were
no significant differences in bone mineral density (g/cm 2 ), load to failure, superior migration over 3000 cycles, or superior displacement. The anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction
had significantly less ( P < .05) anterior and posterior translation than the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. The arthroscopic reconstruction yielded
significantly less anterior displacement ( P < .05) than the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure.
Conclusion: The anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction has less anterior and posterior translation and more closely approximates
the intact state, restoring function of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments.
Clinical Relevance: A more anatomical reconstruction using a free tendon graft of both the trapezoid and conoid ligaments may provide a stronger,
permanent biologic solution for dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. This reconstruction may minimize recurrent subluxation
and residual pain and permit earlier rehabilitation.
Keywords:
shoulder
acromioclavicular joint
biomechanics
surgery
anatomical reconstruction |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0363546505281795 |