Heart rate variability in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: association with functional classification and left ventricular outflow gradients

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate cardiac autonomic control in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and to assess the indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) in relation to the clinical and echocardiographic features. Methods and results: Twenty-three patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2001-02, Vol.77 (2), p.281-286
Hauptverfasser: Döven, Oben, Sayin, Tamer, Güldal, Muharrem, Karaoǧuz, Remzi, Oral, Derviş
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The aim of this study was to investigate cardiac autonomic control in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and to assess the indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) in relation to the clinical and echocardiographic features. Methods and results: Twenty-three patients (17 male, six female: mean age 43±11) with HOCM and 18 healthy volunteers were included. M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography, pulsed and continuous-wave Doppler studies were obtained. All patients and volunteers underwent continuous 24-h ambulatory ECG monitoring. Time domain variables considered in this study were standard deviation of mean R–R intervals (SDNN), root mean-squared successive difference (RMSSD) and percentage of cycles differing from the preceding one by more than 50 ms (PNN 50%). Patients were compared to detect associations between indices of heart rate variability, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and clinical status. Heart rate variability parameters were also correlated with the echocardiographic and clinical characteristics of the patients. Both New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I–II patients (group I) and NYHA III–IV patients (group II) had lower values of SDNN, RMSSD and PNN 50% when compared with the control group ( P
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/S0167-5273(00)00447-2