Comparison of spiral and electron beam tomography in the evaluation of coronary calcification in asymptomatic persons

Recently, investigators have begun evaluating the ability of spiral computed tomography (sequence scan mode–SEQ) to measure coronary calcium. Electron Beam Tomography (EBT) and SEQ studies were performed in 10 women and 23 men, with a mean age of 54±9 years. The EBT study was performed within 4 weeks (mean 11±4 days) of the SEQ with no clinical interval event (MI, revascularization). The mean EBT calcium score (Agatston method) was 52.1±58.6, with a range of 0 to 175. The SEQ mean score was 60.1±71.1 (range 0 to 253). There were 7 persons with scores of 0 on both scans, and 9 persons with scores of zero on either EBT or spiral CT, but not both. Three persons had negative EBT studies where SEQ detected calcium, and 6 persons had EBT detected calcium and negative SEQ studies. The six patients with negative SEQ and positive EBT studies had a mean score of 47±25.7 (range 9 to 99). The remaining sixteen persons had coronary calcium detected on both studies. As compared to EBT, spiral CT had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 70%, for an overall diagnostic accuracy of 73%. The positive and negative predictive values were 85 and 54%, respectively for SEQ in this study. The absolute difference in scores between the two tests was 29.1±28.5 (mean±S.D.). The inter-test variability, defined as the mean values of the differences between the calcium scores in the two scans on the same subjects divided by the mean of the two scores (Absolute Difference between tests/mean), was 84.5% in this study. In asymptomatic persons, spiral CT (using SEQ) provides a limited sensitivity (74%) and specificity (70%) for coronary calcium when compared to EBT. Caution should be used when evaluating the results of spiral CT coronary calcium especially in patients with relatively low calcium scores (