Oxygen isotope fractionation in healthy subjects and in patients with COPD
Abstract We determined the oxygen isotope fractionation degree for oxygen utilized ( δU ) in expired alveolar gas relative to inspired air in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and, for comparison, in two groups of healthy subjects, old and young. In addition, we determined Δrel R...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2007-08, Vol.157 (2), p.335-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract We determined the oxygen isotope fractionation degree for oxygen utilized ( δU ) in expired alveolar gas relative to inspired air in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and, for comparison, in two groups of healthy subjects, old and young. In addition, we determined Δrel Rvent and Δrel Rtot . These determinants of δU (=Δrel Rtot − Δrel Rvent ) are related to the oxygen isotope fractionation which occurs in the first part of the O2 pathway by ventilation of alveolar gas (Δrel Rvent ) and by O2 transport and utilization in the rest of the O2 pathway from the alveolar space (Δrel Rtot ). Mean δU values for the three groups of subjects were close: 9.0, 9.0 and 9.9‰, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Mean Δrel Rvent for patients with COPD was substantially larger than for young, healthy subjects, 4.0‰ versus 0.94‰, with P < 10−3 . This result indicates that the contribution of intrapulmonary gas transport by diffusion to Δrel Rvent is larger for patients with COPD than for young, healthy subjects. Mean Δrel Rtot for patients with COPD was also larger than for young, healthy subjects, 13.0‰ versus 10.84‰, but this difference was not significant ( P = 0.06). Further, Δrel Rtot was much larger than Δrel Rvent for all groups of subjects ( P < 10−7 ). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-9048 1878-1519 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.resp.2006.12.011 |