Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy of the left side of the colon

Background Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) on the left side of the colon is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique, increasingly used to treat lower-GI conditions. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a PEC tube insertion at a single unit. Design Retrospective data collection....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2007-06, Vol.65 (7), p.1007-1014
Hauptverfasser: Cowlam, Simon, MBBS, MRCP, Watson, Christine, BSc, Elltringham, Mark, MBBS, MRCS, Bain, Ian, MA, FRCS, Barrett, Paul, MBChB, RRCPath, Green, Susan, MBBS, FRCS, MD, Yiannakou, Yan, MBChB, MRCP, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) on the left side of the colon is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique, increasingly used to treat lower-GI conditions. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a PEC tube insertion at a single unit. Design Retrospective data collection. Setting District general and teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. Patients Data collected from patients with lower-GI disorders who had a PEC tube inserted. Interventions Data collection. Main Outcome Measurements Incidence of complications and patient outcome. Results Between 2001 and 2005, 31 patients presented for a PEC. Insertion was possible in 27 patients. Indications included functional constipation (n = 8), recurrent sigmoid volvulus (n = 8), colonic pseudo-obstruction (n = 5), and neurologic constipation (n = 6). In 22 patients (81%), symptoms were markedly improved after insertion. Sigmoid volvulus did not recur with a PEC tube in place. The mean (standard error of the mean) duration with tubes in situ was 9.5 ± 1.6 months. Only 2 patients still had a PEC tube in situ. A total of 77% of patients had episodes of infection. Infective episodes led to tube removal in 44% of the total group. Other complications included buried internal bolster, fecal leakage, and pain. Mortality was high (26%), with 7 deaths: 5 from unrelated causes and 2 deaths from fecal peritonitis. Limitations This was a retrospective study. A prospective study in our unit is unlikely because of these results. Conclusions Symptoms were effectively controlled by a PEC tube insertion, and recurrent sigmoid volvulus was prevented. Recurrent complications caused significant morbidity. Infection necessitated tube removal in the majority of patients. Fatal fecal peritonitis occurred in 2 patients. Indiscriminate use of a PEC in the left side of the colon is not recommended. A PEC should only be considered in carefully selected cases.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.012