Some Common Ethical Problems in Medical Practice

Considers a number of ethical dilemmas commonly faced by doctors. Such dilemmas may be separated into those with consensual & non-consensual views, but debate continues. If a physician confronts a legal dilemma, then he should consult a reputably attorney or attempt to acquire a court decision....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social philosophy 2000, Vol.31 (4), p.371-375
1. Verfasser: Kirei, Bernard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 375
container_issue 4
container_start_page 371
container_title Journal of social philosophy
container_volume 31
creator Kirei, Bernard
description Considers a number of ethical dilemmas commonly faced by doctors. Such dilemmas may be separated into those with consensual & non-consensual views, but debate continues. If a physician confronts a legal dilemma, then he should consult a reputably attorney or attempt to acquire a court decision. There are many instances when the requirements of ethical codes are incompatible with the legal interest; the consensus holds that the latter take priority. A number of frequently experienced situations are described in which physicians may face a dilemma, & the current consensual perspective on that dilemma is discussed. K. Coddon
doi_str_mv 10.1111/0047-2786.00057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70552797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60005398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2767-a73dc7352014a8c11ab4a3fdcb8ba6b5c35867d13e455dda6e87ca95d2ea35243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9PwjAYhhujEUTP3sxO3gbt-ms7GkTUoBDRkHBpuvYjTjeG64jy37u5BY98lyZfn_fNlwehS4L7pJoBxkz6gQxFH2PM5RHqEiakH4WUHqPu_reDzpz7qBCGBT9FHcKxiCIWdBGe5xl4wzzL8rU3Kt8To1NvVuRxCpnzkrX3BLbdaVMmBs7RyUqnDi7at4fe7kavw3t_Mh0_DG8mvglkdYGW1BpJeYAJ06EhRMdM05U1cRhrEXNDeSikJRQY59ZqAaE0OuI2AF2lGO2h66Z3U-RfW3ClyhJnIE31GvKtUxJzHshIHgRFbYZWRnpo0ICmyJ0rYKU2RZLpYqcIVrVNVftStS_1Z7NKXLXV2zgD-8-3-iqANcB3ksLuUJ96nM5nTa_fxBJXws8-potPJSSVXC2ex2q8XN6-LPitiugvqhGL7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60005398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Common Ethical Problems in Medical Practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kirei, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirei, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>Considers a number of ethical dilemmas commonly faced by doctors. Such dilemmas may be separated into those with consensual &amp; non-consensual views, but debate continues. If a physician confronts a legal dilemma, then he should consult a reputably attorney or attempt to acquire a court decision. There are many instances when the requirements of ethical codes are incompatible with the legal interest; the consensus holds that the latter take priority. A number of frequently experienced situations are described in which physicians may face a dilemma, &amp; the current consensual perspective on that dilemma is discussed. K. Coddon</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0047-2786.00057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15069942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Induced - ethics ; Beginning of Human Life ; Bioethical Issues ; Bioethics ; Capital Punishment ; Codes of Conduct ; Confidentiality - ethics ; Consensus ; Ethics, Medical ; Euthanasia, Active - ethics ; Euthanasia, Passive - ethics ; Humans ; Informed Consent - ethics ; Legal System ; Medical Decision Making ; Physician's Role ; Physicians ; Practitioner Patient Relationship ; Professional Ethics</subject><ispartof>Journal of social philosophy, 2000, Vol.31 (4), p.371-375</ispartof><rights>2000 Blackwell Publishers, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F0047-2786.00057$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F0047-2786.00057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33752,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15069942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirei, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Some Common Ethical Problems in Medical Practice</title><title>Journal of social philosophy</title><addtitle>J Soc Philos</addtitle><description>Considers a number of ethical dilemmas commonly faced by doctors. Such dilemmas may be separated into those with consensual &amp; non-consensual views, but debate continues. If a physician confronts a legal dilemma, then he should consult a reputably attorney or attempt to acquire a court decision. There are many instances when the requirements of ethical codes are incompatible with the legal interest; the consensus holds that the latter take priority. A number of frequently experienced situations are described in which physicians may face a dilemma, &amp; the current consensual perspective on that dilemma is discussed. K. Coddon</description><subject>Abortion, Induced - ethics</subject><subject>Beginning of Human Life</subject><subject>Bioethical Issues</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Capital Punishment</subject><subject>Codes of Conduct</subject><subject>Confidentiality - ethics</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Euthanasia, Active - ethics</subject><subject>Euthanasia, Passive - ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - ethics</subject><subject>Legal System</subject><subject>Medical Decision Making</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practitioner Patient Relationship</subject><subject>Professional Ethics</subject><issn>0047-2786</issn><issn>1467-9833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9PwjAYhhujEUTP3sxO3gbt-ms7GkTUoBDRkHBpuvYjTjeG64jy37u5BY98lyZfn_fNlwehS4L7pJoBxkz6gQxFH2PM5RHqEiakH4WUHqPu_reDzpz7qBCGBT9FHcKxiCIWdBGe5xl4wzzL8rU3Kt8To1NvVuRxCpnzkrX3BLbdaVMmBs7RyUqnDi7at4fe7kavw3t_Mh0_DG8mvglkdYGW1BpJeYAJ06EhRMdM05U1cRhrEXNDeSikJRQY59ZqAaE0OuI2AF2lGO2h66Z3U-RfW3ClyhJnIE31GvKtUxJzHshIHgRFbYZWRnpo0ICmyJ0rYKU2RZLpYqcIVrVNVftStS_1Z7NKXLXV2zgD-8-3-iqANcB3ksLuUJ96nM5nTa_fxBJXws8-potPJSSVXC2ex2q8XN6-LPitiugvqhGL7w</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Kirei, Bernard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Some Common Ethical Problems in Medical Practice</title><author>Kirei, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2767-a73dc7352014a8c11ab4a3fdcb8ba6b5c35867d13e455dda6e87ca95d2ea35243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Induced - ethics</topic><topic>Beginning of Human Life</topic><topic>Bioethical Issues</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Capital Punishment</topic><topic>Codes of Conduct</topic><topic>Confidentiality - ethics</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Euthanasia, Active - ethics</topic><topic>Euthanasia, Passive - ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - ethics</topic><topic>Legal System</topic><topic>Medical Decision Making</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practitioner Patient Relationship</topic><topic>Professional Ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirei, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of social philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirei, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Common Ethical Problems in Medical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social philosophy</jtitle><addtitle>J Soc Philos</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>371-375</pages><issn>0047-2786</issn><eissn>1467-9833</eissn><abstract>Considers a number of ethical dilemmas commonly faced by doctors. Such dilemmas may be separated into those with consensual &amp; non-consensual views, but debate continues. If a physician confronts a legal dilemma, then he should consult a reputably attorney or attempt to acquire a court decision. There are many instances when the requirements of ethical codes are incompatible with the legal interest; the consensus holds that the latter take priority. A number of frequently experienced situations are described in which physicians may face a dilemma, &amp; the current consensual perspective on that dilemma is discussed. K. Coddon</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><pmid>15069942</pmid><doi>10.1111/0047-2786.00057</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2786
ispartof Journal of social philosophy, 2000, Vol.31 (4), p.371-375
issn 0047-2786
1467-9833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70552797
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Abortion, Induced - ethics
Beginning of Human Life
Bioethical Issues
Bioethics
Capital Punishment
Codes of Conduct
Confidentiality - ethics
Consensus
Ethics, Medical
Euthanasia, Active - ethics
Euthanasia, Passive - ethics
Humans
Informed Consent - ethics
Legal System
Medical Decision Making
Physician's Role
Physicians
Practitioner Patient Relationship
Professional Ethics
title Some Common Ethical Problems in Medical Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A22%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Common%20Ethical%20Problems%20in%20Medical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20philosophy&rft.au=Kirei,%20Bernard&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=371-375&rft.issn=0047-2786&rft.eissn=1467-9833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0047-2786.00057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60005398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60005398&rft_id=info:pmid/15069942&rfr_iscdi=true