Trigonal Prismatic vs Octahedral Coordination Geometry:  Syntheses and Structural Characterization of Hexakis(arylthiolato) Zirconate Complexes

Treating [Li(tmeda)]2[Zr(CH3)6] with aryl thiols, HSC6H4-4-R, in a 1:6 stoichiometry in diethyl ether affords excellent yields of [Li(tmeda)]2[Zr(SC6H4-4-R)6], where R = CH3 (1 2-) or OCH3 (2 2-) and tmeda denotes N,N,N‘,N‘-tetramethylethylenediamine. These complexes are air-sensitive canary-yellow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inorganic chemistry 2000-04, Vol.39 (7), p.1496-1500
Hauptverfasser: Friese, Jan C, Krol, Arndt, Puke, Carsten, Kirschbaum, Kristin, Giolando, Dean M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Treating [Li(tmeda)]2[Zr(CH3)6] with aryl thiols, HSC6H4-4-R, in a 1:6 stoichiometry in diethyl ether affords excellent yields of [Li(tmeda)]2[Zr(SC6H4-4-R)6], where R = CH3 (1 2-) or OCH3 (2 2-) and tmeda denotes N,N,N‘,N‘-tetramethylethylenediamine. These complexes are air-sensitive canary-yellow solids, soluble in hexane, diethyl ether, THF, and acetonitrile, that form yellow single crystals of [Li(tmeda)]2 1 (diethyl ether solution) or [Li(THF)3]2 2 (THF solution) from saturated solutions at −20 °C. Both complexes were characterized by X-ray crystallography and consist of a zirconium atom coordinated solely by the sulfur atoms of six aryl thiolate ligands in a nonoctahedral geometry. In each structure the lithium cation coordinates to the three sulfur atoms on the triangular faces of the S6 pseudotrigonal prism. These lithium−sulfur interactions appear to play a role in determining the coordination geometry about the metal center by orienting the sulfur lone pairs of electrons slightly out of the plane defined by the S3 triangular face and tilted away from the zirconium atoms. A likely consequence is the positioning of the sulfur lone pairs of electrons away from orthogonality with the zirconium−sulfur vector, and hence, they are poorly arranged to π-interact with zirconium. Complex 1 2- with a twist angle of ca. 9.18° (trigonal prism, 0°; octahedron, 60°) agrees with the interpretations of computational studies on d0 complexes, which suggest that a nearly trigonal prismatic geometry is favored when the interaction between metal and ligand is primarily through σ-bonds. The intrinsically weak π-donor thiolate ligand is probably converted to a primarily σ-bonding system by the lithium−sulfur interaction. On the other hand complex 2 2- with a twist angle of ca. 30.38° is trigonally twisted to the midpoint of the trigonal prismatic-to-octahedral reaction coordinate. In complex 2 2- the 4-OCH3 group is an electron donor by resonance effects that possibly may lead to the movement away from the expected trigonal prismatic geometry due to either π-interactions or electrostatics repulsion.
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/ic991402e