Differential recovery of membrane proteins after extraction by aqueous methanol and trifluoroethanol
Cell membrane proteome analysis is limited by inherent membrane hydrophobicity. Conventional membrane protein extraction techniques use detergents, chaotropes and organic acids that require sample clean‐up or pH adjustment, and are associated with significant sample loss. We extracted membrane prote...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proteomics (Weinheim) 2007-05, Vol.7 (10), p.1654-1663 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cell membrane proteome analysis is limited by inherent membrane hydrophobicity. Conventional membrane protein extraction techniques use detergents, chaotropes and organic acids that require sample clean‐up or pH adjustment, and are associated with significant sample loss. We extracted membrane proteins from red blood cells (RBCs) using methanol (MeOH), trifluoroethanol (TFE) and urea, and identified membrane proteins using 2‐D LC coupled with MALDI‐TOF/TOF‐MS. We show that organic solvents MeOH‐ and TFE‐based methods have membrane protein analysis efficiencies comparable to urea, and are complementary for the recovery of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic peptides. The mean grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) value of identified peptides from the TFE‐based method (−0.107) was significantly higher than that of the MeOH‐based method (−0.465) (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1615-9853 1615-9861 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pmic.200600579 |