A single drug-resistance mutation in HSV-1 UL52 primase points to a difference between two helicase–primase inhibitors in their mode of interaction with the antiviral target

Objectives To investigate the mechanism of action of the helicase–primase inhibitors (HPIs) BAY 57-1293 and BILS 22 BS by selection and characterization of drug-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 mutants. Methods HSV-1 mutants were selected using BAY 57-1293 in Vero cells. Resistance mutations i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2008-05, Vol.61 (5), p.1044-1047
Hauptverfasser: Biswas, Subhajit, Kleymann, Gerald, Swift, Mihaiela, Tiley, Laurence S., Lyall, Jonathan, Aguirre-Hernández, Jesús, Field, Hugh J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To investigate the mechanism of action of the helicase–primase inhibitors (HPIs) BAY 57-1293 and BILS 22 BS by selection and characterization of drug-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 mutants. Methods HSV-1 mutants were selected using BAY 57-1293 in Vero cells. Resistance mutations identified in the UL5 helicase or UL52 primase genes were validated by marker transfer. Cross-resistance to the structurally distinct BILS 22 BS was measured by ID50 determinations. Results (i) A single mutation (UL52: A899T) confers 43-fold resistance to BAY 57-1293, but does not confer any resistance to BILS 22 BS. (ii) A double mutant (UL52: A899T and UL5: K356T) is 2500-fold resistant to BAY 57-1293, which is more than 17 times the sum of fold-resistance due to the individual mutations, UL52: A899T (43-fold) and UL5: K356T (100-fold). (iii) Virus containing the single helicase mutation and the double mutant with mutations in both helicase and primase showed equal resistance to BILS 22 BS (70-fold). Conclusions By measuring the relative inhibitory concentrations required to overcome particular mutations in the helicase and primase proteins, evidence was obtained that BAY 57-1293 interacts with both components of the helicase–primase complex to achieve maximum potency, whereas for BILS 22BS, this may not be the case. Furthermore, our observations suggest that BAY 57-1293 interacts simultaneously with UL5 and UL52. Overall, the results suggest that these two potent HPIs interact differently with the helicase–primase complex.
ISSN:0305-7453
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/dkn057