Does measuring BHR add to guideline derived clinical measures in determining treatment for patients with persistent asthma?

Summary Rationale Little is known about the use of biomarkers in guiding treatment decisions in routine asthma management. The objective of this study was to determine whether adding a LABA to an ICS would control bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) at an overall lower dose of ICS when titration of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2008-05, Vol.102 (5), p.665-673
Hauptverfasser: Koenig, Steven M, Murray, John J, Wolfe, James, Andersen, Leslie, Yancey, Steve, Prillaman, Barbara, Stauffer, John, Dorinsky, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Rationale Little is known about the use of biomarkers in guiding treatment decisions in routine asthma management. The objective of this study was to determine whether adding a LABA to an ICS would control bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) at an overall lower dose of ICS when titration of medication was based upon the assessment of routine clinical measures with or without the measurement of BHR. Methods After a 2-week run-in period, subjects (⩾12 years) were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Two groups followed a BHR treatment strategy (based on clinical parameters [lung function, asthma symptoms, and bronchodilator use] and BHR) and were treated with either fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSCBHR group) or fluticasone propionate (FPBHR group) ( n =156 each). The third group followed a clinical treatment algorithm (based on clinical parameters alone) and were treated with fluticasone propionate (FPREF group; n =154). All treatments were administered via Diskus® . Treatment doses were adjusted as needed every 8 weeks for 40 weeks according to the subject's derived severity class, which was based on clinical measures of asthma control with or without BHR. Results The mean total daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose during the double-blind treatment period was lower, although not statistically significant, in the FSCBHR group compared with the FPBHR group (a difference of −42.9 mcg; p =0.07). Compared with the FPREF group, the mean total daily ICS dose was higher in the FSCBHR group (a difference of 85.2 mcg) and was significantly higher in the FPBHR group (a difference of 131.2 mcg, p =0.037). Conclusion This study demonstrated that for most subjects, control of BHR was maintained when treatment was directed toward control of clinical parameters. In addition, there was a trend towards control of BHR and clinical measures at a lower dose of ICS when used concurrently with salmeterol.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2007.12.023