Assessing normal pulse wave velocity in the proximal pulmonary arteries using transit time: A feasibility, repeatability, and observer reproducibility study by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Purpose To calculate pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the proximal pulmonary arteries (PAs) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using the transit‐time method, and address respiratory variation, repeatability, and observer reproducibility. Materials and Methods A 1.9‐msec interleaved phase velocit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2007-05, Vol.25 (5), p.974-981
Hauptverfasser: Bradlow, William M., Gatehouse, Peter D., Hughes, Ray L., O'Brien, Aoife B., Gibbs, John S.R., Firmin, David N., Mohiaddin, Raad H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To calculate pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the proximal pulmonary arteries (PAs) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using the transit‐time method, and address respiratory variation, repeatability, and observer reproducibility. Materials and Methods A 1.9‐msec interleaved phase velocity sequence was repeated three times consecutively in 10 normal subjects. Pulse wave (PW) arrival times (ATs) were determined for the main and branch PAs. The PWV was calculated by dividing the path length traveled by the difference in ATs. Respiratory variation was considered by comparing acquisitions with and without respiratory gating. Results For navigated data the mean PWVs for the left PA (LPA) and right PA (RPA) were 2.09 ± 0.64 m/second and 2.33 ± 0.44 m/second, respectively. For non‐navigated data the mean PWVs for the LPA and RPA were 2.14 ± 0.41 m/second and 2.31 ± 0.49 m/second, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between respiratory non‐navigated data and navigated data. Repeated on‐table measurements were consistent (LPA non‐navigated P = 0.95, RPA non‐navigated P = 0.91, LPA navigated P = 0.96, RPA navigated P = 0.51). The coefficients of variation (CVs) were 12.2% and 12.5% for intra‐ and interobserver assessments, respectively. Conclusion One can measure PWV in the proximal PAs using transit‐time in a reproducible manner without respiratory gating. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;25:974–981. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.20888