Neonatal end-of-life practice in a German perinatal centre

Aim: To investigate the end‐of‐life practice in a large perinatal centre in Germany. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed in all neonates deceased in the delivery room (n = 31) and the neonatal intensive care unit (n = 47) between 2002 and 2004. Results: Neonatal death was preceded by a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta Paediatrica 2007-05, Vol.96 (5), p.681-687
Hauptverfasser: Schulz-Baldes, A, Huseman, D, Loui, A, Dudenhausen, JW, Obladen, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim: To investigate the end‐of‐life practice in a large perinatal centre in Germany. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed in all neonates deceased in the delivery room (n = 31) and the neonatal intensive care unit (n = 47) between 2002 and 2004. Results: Neonatal death was preceded by an end‐of‐life decision (EOLD) in 81% of cases in the delivery room and 83% in the neonatal intensive care unit. The majority of deceased neonates were born prematurely or with congenital malformation. Life‐sustaining treatment was not initiated in 74% of the infants deceased in the delivery room. In the unit, 52% died after withdrawal of therapy. Mechanical ventilation was withdrawn most frequently (79% of cases). Futility and immediate death were common considerations in EOLD, but the infant's suffering and future quality of life also played a role. Parents were involved in EOLD‐making in all but emergency cases. No active termination of life was performed. Conclusion: In our perinatal centre, the majority of neonatal deaths occurred after limitation of therapy. Treatment was actively withdrawn in half of the infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Actual end‐of‐life practice in a large perinatal centre differs from the restrictive attitude towards EOLD reported for German neonatologists in previous surveys.
ISSN:0803-5253
1651-2227
DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00234.x