Development of empirical models for performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different operational conditions

A nonlinear modeling study was carried out to evaluate the performance of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different organic and hydraulic loading conditions. Two identical pilot scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors (15.7 L) were run at mesophilic conditions (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hazardous materials 2008-05, Vol.153 (1), p.532-543
Hauptverfasser: Yetilmezsoy, Kaan, Sakar, Suleyman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A nonlinear modeling study was carried out to evaluate the performance of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different organic and hydraulic loading conditions. Two identical pilot scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors (15.7 L) were run at mesophilic conditions (30–35 °C) in a temperature-controlled environment with three hydraulic retention times ( θ) of 15.7, 12 and 8.0 days. Imposed volumetric organic loading rates ( L V) ranged from 0.65 to 4.257 kg COD/(m 3 day). The pH of the feed varied between 6.68 and 7.82. The hydraulic loading rates ( L H) were controlled between 0.105 and 0.21 m 3/(m 2 day). The daily biogas production rates ranged between 4.2 and 29.4 L/day. High volumetric COD removal rates ( R V) ranging from 0.546 to 3.779 kg COD removed/(m 3 day) were achieved. On the basis of experimental results, two empirical models having a satisfactory correlation coefficient of about 0.9954 and 0.9416 were developed to predict daily biogas production ( Q g) and effluent COD concentration ( S e), respectively. Findings of this modeling study showed that optimal COD removals ranging from 86.3% to 90.6% were predicted with HRTs of 7.9, 9.5, 11.2, 12.6, 13.7 and 14.3 days, and L V of 1.27, 1.58, 1.78, 1.99, 2.20 and 2.45 kg COD/(m 3 day) for the corresponding influent substrate concentrations ( S i) of 10,000, 15,000, 20,000, 25,000, 30,000 and 35,000 mg/L, respectively.
ISSN:0304-3894
1873-3336
DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.087