Stapled Technique for Acute Thrombosed Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Controlled Trial with Long-Term Results
Purpose This study was designed to compare stapled vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy for patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids. Methods Forty-one patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids were randomized into: 1) stapled hemorrhoidectomy (PPH group; n = 21), and 2) open hemorrhoidectomy (open...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 2008-04, Vol.51 (4), p.397-403 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study was designed to compare stapled
vs.
conventional hemorrhoidectomy for patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids.
Methods
Forty-one patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids were randomized into: 1) stapled hemorrhoidectomy (PPH group; n = 21), and 2) open hemorrhoidectomy (open group; n = 20). Emergency surgery was performed with perioperative data and complications were recorded. Patients were followed up by independent assessors to evaluate pain, recurrence, continence function, and satisfaction at regular intervals.
Results
The median follow-up for the PPH group and open group were 59 and 56 weeks, respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of the hospital stay, complication rate, and continence function; however, the mean pain intensity in the first postoperative week was significantly less in the PPH group (4.1
vs.
5.7,
P
= 0.02). Patients in the PPH group recovered significantly faster in terms of the time to become analgesic-free (4
vs.
8.5 days,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10350-007-9085-3 |