Prioritisation of routine vaccines: a mistake for the USA
Frequency of disease is at a record low1 and vaccination coverage at record highs.2 During the past 2 years, an unprecedented number of new, and more expensive, vaccines were recommended for universal use, including: meningococcal conjugate vaccine; tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vacci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2008-03, Vol.371 (9616), p.881-882 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Frequency of disease is at a record low1 and vaccination coverage at record highs.2 During the past 2 years, an unprecedented number of new, and more expensive, vaccines were recommended for universal use, including: meningococcal conjugate vaccine; tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine for adolescents; hepatitis A vaccine; rotavirus vaccine; and human papillomavirus vaccine. The USA fosters the development of new vaccines through: consistent support from paediatricians, family physicians, public-health officials, and parents for the use of vaccines to prevent infectious diseases; private insurance that generally supports higher prices for new vaccines; the Vaccines for Children programme, which guarantees purchase of almost half the vaccines in the USA; and school immunisation requirements that help to weave vaccination into the fabric of society.5 A favourable forum for vaccine development is only part of the story. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60394-3 |