Perception Gap in Quality-of-Life Ratings: An Empirical Investigation of Nursing Home Residents and Caregivers

Purpose: Several studies have previously documented the existence of a perception gap—the extent to which quality-of-life ratings provided by nursing home residents and caregivers diverge. In this study we use Helson's adaptation-level theory to investigate three types of antecedents: (a) focal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Gerontologist 2007-04, Vol.47 (2), p.159-168
Hauptverfasser: Mittal, Vikas, Rosen, Jules, Govind, Rahul, Degenholtz, Howard, Shingala, Sunil, Hulland, Shelley, Rhee, YongJoo, Kastango, Kari B., Mulsant, Benoit H., Castle, Nick, Rubin, Fred H., Nace, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Several studies have previously documented the existence of a perception gap—the extent to which quality-of-life ratings provided by nursing home residents and caregivers diverge. In this study we use Helson's adaptation-level theory to investigate three types of antecedents: (a) focal factors, (b) background factors, and (c) residual factors. Design and Methods: We calculated the perception gap for 11 quality-of-life domains. Caregivers rated both job satisfaction and their perception of quality of life of residents in the unit where they provided service. Concurrently, residents from these units completed quality-of-life interviews. We computed the perception gap by subtracting the residents' ratings from the caregivers' ratings for each quality-of-life domain. We conducted a hierarchical linear model using 3,850 observations to predict the perception gap.  Results: Caregivers perceive quality of life to be lower than residents do across all domains fairly consistently. Caregiver demographics do not directly predict the perception gap. However, satisfaction with work, pay, and promotion were significant predictors (p
ISSN:0016-9013
1758-5341
DOI:10.1093/geront/47.2.159