Cell blocks of breast FNAs frequently allow diagnosis of invasion or histological classification of proliferative changes

Two major limitations of breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) compared with core needle biopsies (CNB) are the inability to determine whether a cancer is invasive and to classify proliferative lesions. We studied 40 consecutive “rapid cell blocks” from breast FNAs with surgical pathology follow‐up to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2007-05, Vol.35 (5), p.263-269
Hauptverfasser: Istvanic, Smiljana, Fischer, Andrew H., Banner, Barbara F., Eaton, Donna M., Larkin, Anne C., Khan, Ashraf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two major limitations of breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) compared with core needle biopsies (CNB) are the inability to determine whether a cancer is invasive and to classify proliferative lesions. We studied 40 consecutive “rapid cell blocks” from breast FNAs with surgical pathology follow‐up to test whether cell blocks can overcome these limitations. Of 25 carcinomas, invasion could be identified in the cell block sections in 11 (44%). One cystosarcoma phyllodes was suspected based on the cell block sections. Cell blocks from 12 of 14 benign breast FNAs showed sufficient cells to assign a histologic diagnosis of no hyperplasia (1 case, confirmed on follow‐up) and usual hyperplasia (11 cases; confirmed in eight of 11 on follow‐up). Specific histologic diagnoses included intraductal papilloma (2 cases), and in situ lobular neoplasia (2 cases). Cell blocks complement smears and monolayers and appear to overcome major limitations of breast FNA. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007;35:263–269. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:8755-1039
1097-0339
DOI:10.1002/dc.20630