National survey of the technique of intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the United Kingdom

Objectives Intravitreal injection of steroids is a rapidly evolving treatment option for a variety of retinal pathologies. There is wide variation among ophthalmologists regarding dose of steroid and the technique of injection. Through this survey we aim to describe the current practice of injection...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2007-04, Vol.21 (4), p.480-486
Hauptverfasser: Anijeet, D R, Hanson, R J, Bhagey, J, Bates, R A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Intravitreal injection of steroids is a rapidly evolving treatment option for a variety of retinal pathologies. There is wide variation among ophthalmologists regarding dose of steroid and the technique of injection. Through this survey we aim to describe the current practice of injection of intravitreal steroid among ophthalmic consultants in the United Kingdom and review the literature. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to all the 901 ophthalmic consultants in the United Kingdom. The questions covered frequency of intravitreal steroid injections, subspecialty interest, dosage and volume of steroid, patient preparation, surgeon preparation, and postoperative management. Results The response rate to the questionnaire was 63%. A total of 24.7% perform intravitreal steroid injections regularly with 90% of users performing five or fewer injections per month. In all, 94% use a dose of 4 mg. Among surgeons, 38% do not prescribe postoperative antibiotics or steroids and 59% check intraocular pressure either on the same or the next day. Conclusion The relatively short experience with this technique has not yet allowed a clear picture to emerge of indications, complications or best practice administration. Published descriptions of intravitreal steroid injection techniques vary widely and variations are not evidence based. Observed UK practice is diverse.
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/sj.eye.6702232