Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-independent suppression of androgen receptor expression by troglitazone mechanism and pharmacologic exploitation

Previously, we showed that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonist troglitazone at high doses was able to suppress androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP prostate cancer cells independently of PPARgamma. Pharmacologic exploitation of this finding led to STG28, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2007-04, Vol.67 (7), p.3229-3238
Hauptverfasser: YANG, Chih-Cheng, WANG, Yu-Chieh, SHUO WEI, LIN, Li-Fang, CHEN, Chang-Shi, LEE, Cheng-Chun, LIN, Cheng-Chieh, CHEN, Ching-Shih
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previously, we showed that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonist troglitazone at high doses was able to suppress androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP prostate cancer cells independently of PPARgamma. Pharmacologic exploitation of this finding led to STG28, a PPARgamma-inactive analogue of troglitazone with substantially higher potency in AR repression. Considering the pivotal role of AR in prostate tumorigenesis, this study investigates the mechanism by which troglitazone and derivatives suppress AR expression in LNCaP cells. Reverse transcription-PCR and reporter gene assays indicate that this drug-induced AR repression occurs at both mRNA and protein levels. Evidence suggests that troglitazone and derivatives mediate the transcriptional repression of AR by facilitating the ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of the transcriptional factor Sp1. These agents also cause the proteolysis of two proteins that regulate Sp1-mediated transcription (i.e., the TATA-binding protein-associated factor TAF(II)250 and cyclin D1). However, their involvement in the transcriptional repression of AR is refuted by the finding that small interfering RNA knockdown of these two regulatory proteins does not cause AR down-regulation. STG28 does not cause significant reduction in Sp1 or AR expression in normal prostate epithelial cells. This discriminatory effect underscores the differential susceptibility of malignant versus normal cells to the inhibitory effect of STG28 on cell viability. From a translational perspective, STG28 provides a proof of principle that potent AR-ablative agents could be developed through structural modifications of troglitazone. Moreover, as the control of Sp1 degradation remains unclear, STG28 represents a unique pharmacologic probe to investigate the ubiquitin-proteasome system that regulates Sp1 proteolysis.
ISSN:0008-5472
1538-7445
DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2759