"Off-label" stent therapy 2-year comparison of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents
The aim was to compare 2-year outcomes with the routine use of drug-eluting stents (DES) (>75% "off-label") with a comparable group treated with bare-metal stents (BMS). Safety concerns >1 year from implantation have been raised about DES used "off-label." There are limited...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008-02, Vol.51 (6), p.607-614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim was to compare 2-year outcomes with the routine use of drug-eluting stents (DES) (>75% "off-label") with a comparable group treated with bare-metal stents (BMS).
Safety concerns >1 year from implantation have been raised about DES used "off-label." There are limited data comparing DES and BMS in "off-label" patients.
Clinical outcomes (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], all-cause mortality) were assessed in 1,164 consecutive patients who received BMS in the year before introduction of DES at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and 1,285 consecutive patients who received DES after it became our routine choice. "On-label" stent use was defined as treatment for a single de novo lesion |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.064 |