A Prospective Study of the Prevalence of Nonclassical Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia among Women Presenting with Hyperandrogenic Symptoms and Signs

Context: The diagnosis of the polycystic ovary syndrome requires the exclusion of nonclassical congenital adrenal hyperplasia (NCAH). Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the actual prevalences of 21-hydroxylase and 11β-hydroxylase deficiencies among women presenting with hyperandrogenic complaints. Settings: This study was performed at an academic hospital. Patients: A total of 270 consecutive unselected women presenting with hyperandrogenic symptoms were prospectively recruited. Interventions: Basal and ACTH-stimulated 11-deoxycortisol and 17-hydroxyprogesterone concentrations were measured. Main Outcome Measures: The prevalences of 21-hydroxylase and 11β-hydroxylase deficiencies were calculated, and the diagnostic performance of basal serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels for the screening of NCAH was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Six of the 270 patients had 21-hydroxylase-deficient NCAH that was confirmed by CYP21 genotyping, whereas no patient was diagnosed with 11β-hydroxylase deficiency, for an overall NCAH prevalence of 2.2% (95% confidence limits 0.5–3.9%). According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, a single basal serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone determination has a 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.934–1.008) chance of detecting NCAH in hyperandrogenic women. In our experience, the most appropriate cutoff value for the detection of NCAH is a 17-hydroxyprogesterone above 1.7 ng/ml, showing a 100% sensitivity and a 88.6% specificity. Five of the six 21-hydroxylase-deficient NCAH patients carried a severe CYP21 allele requiring genetic counseling and highlighting the importance of excluding this disorder among hyperandrogenic patients. Conclusions: The prevalence of NCAH among hyperandrogenic patients from Spain is 2.2%. Basal serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone measurements have an excellent diagnostic performance, yet the cutoff value should be established in each laboratory to avoid false-negative results.