Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines

Established guidelines for causal inference in epidemiological studies may be inappropriate for genetic associations. A consensus process was used to develop guidance criteria for assessing cumulative epidemiologic evidence in genetic associations. A proposed semi-quantitative index assigns three le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of epidemiology 2008-02, Vol.37 (1), p.120-132
Hauptverfasser: Ioannidis, John PA, Boffetta, Paolo, Little, Julian, O’Brien, Thomas R, Uitterlinden, Andre G, Vineis, Paolo, Balding, David J, Chokkalingam, Anand, Dolan, Siobhan M, Flanders, W Dana, Higgins, Julian PT, McCarthy, Mark I, McDermott, David H, Page, Grier P, Rebbeck, Timothy R, Seminara, Daniela, Khoury, Muin J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Established guidelines for causal inference in epidemiological studies may be inappropriate for genetic associations. A consensus process was used to develop guidance criteria for assessing cumulative epidemiologic evidence in genetic associations. A proposed semi-quantitative index assigns three levels for the amount of evidence, extent of replication, and protection from bias, and also generates a composite assessment of ‘strong’, ‘moderate’ or ‘weak’ epidemiological credibility. In addition, we discuss how additional input and guidance can be derived from biological data. Future empirical research and consensus development are needed to develop an integrated model for combining epidemiological and biological evidence in the rapidly evolving field of investigation of genetic factors.
ISSN:0300-5771
1464-3685
DOI:10.1093/ije/dym159