Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch block in high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction: The VALIANT experience

Background In survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), new left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with adverse outcomes, but its impact is not well described in post-MI patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and/or heart failure (HF). Objectives The aim of this study was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2007-03, Vol.4 (3), p.308-313
Hauptverfasser: Stephenson, Kent, MD, MPH, Skali, Hicham, MD, MSc, McMurray, John J.V., MD, Velazquez, Eric J., MD, Aylward, Philip G., MD, Kober, Lars, MD, Van de Werf, Frans, MD, PhD, White, Harvey D., DSc, Pieper, Karen S., MS, Califf, Robert M., MD, Solomon, Scott D., MD, Pfeffer, Marc A., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), new left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with adverse outcomes, but its impact is not well described in post-MI patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and/or heart failure (HF). Objectives The aim of this study was to determine if new LBBB is an independent predictor of long-term fatal and nonfatal outcomes in high-risk survivors of MI by reviewing data from the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) trial. Methods In VALIANT, 14,703 patients with LV systolic dysfunction and/or HF were randomized to valsartan, captopril, or both a mean of 5 days after MI. Baseline ECG data were available from 14,259 patients. We assessed the predictive value of new LBBB for death and major cardiovascular outcomes after 3 years, adjusting for multiple baseline covariates including LV ejection fraction. Results At follow-up, patients with new LBBB (608 [4.2%]) compared with patients without new LBBB had more comorbidities and increased adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.6), cardiovascular death (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.7), HF (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6), MI (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9), and the composite of death, HF, or MI (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.6). Conclusion In post-MI survivors with LV systolic dysfunction and/or HF, new LBBB was an independent predictor of all major adverse cardiovascular outcomes during long-term follow-up. This readily available ECG marker should be considered a major risk factor for long-term cardiovascular complications in high-risk patients after MI.
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.021