Levels of organization in biology: on the nature and nomenclature of ecology's fourth level

Viewing the universe as being composed of hierarchically arranged systems is widely accepted as a useful model of reality. In ecology, three levels of organization are generally recognized: organisms, populations, and communities (biocoenoses). For half a century increasing numbers of ecologists hav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2008-02, Vol.83 (1), p.71-78
1. Verfasser: Lidicker Jr, William Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Viewing the universe as being composed of hierarchically arranged systems is widely accepted as a useful model of reality. In ecology, three levels of organization are generally recognized: organisms, populations, and communities (biocoenoses). For half a century increasing numbers of ecologists have concluded that recognition of a fourth level would facilitate increased understanding of ecological phenomena. Sometimes the word “ecosystem” is used for this level, but this is arguably inappropriate. Since 1986, I and others have argued that the term “landscape” would be a suitable term for a level of organization defined as an ecological system containing more than one community type. However, “landscape” and “landscape level” continue to be used extensively by ecologists in the popular sense of a large expanse of space. I therefore now propose that the term “ecoscape” be used instead for this fourth level of organization. A clearly defined fourth level for ecology would focus attention on the emergent properties of this level, and maintain the spatial and temporal scale‐free nature inherent in this hierarchy of organizational levels for living entities.
ISSN:1464-7931
1469-185X
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00032.x