Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

Aim To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures Methods Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2007-03, Vol.21 (3), p.402-407
Hauptverfasser: Birchall, W, Bedggood, A, Wells, A P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures Methods Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 × 4 mm, 16 mm 2 , n =12) or small scleral flaps (3 × 2 mm, 6 mm 2 , n =9) were constructed over 0.76 mm 2 sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. Results Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7–12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10–45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0–3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5–29.3 mmHg) for large ( n =8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9–25.8 mmHg) for small ( n =8) flaps (unpaired t- test, P =0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6–86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8–86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t- test, P =0.2). Conclusions Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/sj.eye.6702253